ArticleCardiology and therapy2025
Cardiovascular Outcomes of Early LDL-C Goal Achievement in Patients with Very-High-Risk ASCVD.
Article in Cardiology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- From early LDL-C achievement to personalized management: considerations for future PCSK9 inhibitor research.Heart and vessels · 2026Article
- Article
- Association of lipid management-related knowledge, attitudes, and practices with LDL-C target attainment in patients with coronary heart disease: a multicenter cross-sectional study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Progress in Achieving LDL Cholesterol Target Levels in a High-Risk Patient Population in Slovakia.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Effects of intensive rosuvastatin on ventricular remodeling and cardiac function in elderly patients with STEMI undergoing PCI.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Impact of early initiation of PCSK9I monoclonal antibodies after acute coronary syndrome.Indian heart journalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionClinical trial evidence supports early low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal achievement in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), but real-world evidence in Asia is lacking. We investigated the effects of early LDL-C goal achievement on recurrent major cardiovascular events (MACEs) among patients with very-high-risk ASCVD in South Korea.
methodsWe included adult patients hospitalized with ASCVD (acute coronary syndrome [ACS], stable angina, ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, peripheral arterial disease, or asymptomatic coronary artery disease) at a major Korean tertiary hospital from 2000 to 2020. Patients were categorized into early or non-early target LDL-C groups based on LDL-C measured 4-12 weeks post-discharge (< 55 vs. ≥ 55 mg/dl). The primary outcome was recurrent MACEs, including myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, all-cause mortality, hospitalization for unstable angina, and coronary revascularization. The secondary outcome was health resource use (frequency/length of stay [LOS]).
resultsDuring follow-up (mean: 5 years), the early target LDL-C group (n = 5702) had a lower risk of recurrent MACEs compared with the non-early target LDL-C group (n = 11,232; adjusted hazard ratio [95% CI]: 0.89 [0.82-0.96]). The effect was most pronounced in patients with ACS (0.73 [0.63-0.85]), particularly for recurrent MACEs within 6 months (0.61 [0.44-0.87]). The early target LDL-C group had 19% lower frequency and 31% shorter LOS for cardiovascular-related hospitalizations than the non-early group.
conclusionsEarly LDL-C goal achievement was associated with lower recurrent MACEs in patients with very-high-risk ASCVD in South Korea, especially in patients with ACS. These findings underscore the importance of early LDL-C management in improving cardiovascular outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.