ArticleBMC women's health2025
Development and validation of scales measuring individual, nursing unit, hospital, and community factors related to fertility intentions of female Japanese hospital nurses.
Article in BMC women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fertility intentions and associated factors among female hospital employees with children: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundScales that comprehensively measure individual, workplace, and community factors related to fertility intentions of women are limited. This study examined the psychometric properties of scales measuring individual (nurse, husband/partner, and child), nursing unit, hospital, and community factors related to fertility intentions of female Japanese hospital nurses. We focused on these nurses because nursing is a gendered profession, and over 90% of nurses in Japan are women. Furthermore, Japanese hospital nurses differ from other female workers in several ways (e.g., professionality, working shifts, financial remuneration).
methodsThis was a methodological study. Data were collected using a cross-sectional, self-administered questionnaire survey. Data from 898 Japanese female hospital nurses (age range, 20-49 years) from 50 hospitals were analyzed. The initial scales were developed through semi-structured interviews, a literature review, an expert review, and a pilot study. Item analysis and exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed, Cronbach's α was calculated, and known group validity was examined.
resultsThe following individual factor scales were obtained: a 12-item, four-domain nurse factor (Economic Needs, Timing of Life Events, Nursing Aspirations, and Career Development) scale, a six-item, two-domain husband/partner factor (Share of Housework and Childcare and Relationship with Husband/Partner) scale, and a three-item, one-domain child factor scale. Likewise, we identified a 13-item, four-domain nursing unit factor (Guilty Feelings toward Colleagues, Unit Nurse Manager's Management, Workability, and Collegiality) scale, a nine-item, three-domain hospital factor (Access to Legal Rights, Support for Mothers, and Comfort in Hospitals) scale, and a six-item, two-domain community factor (Governmental Family Support and Culture of Working Women) scale. Except for the child factor scale, the comparative fit index was > 0.950, and the root mean square error of approximation was < 0.070. Cronbach's α ranged from 0.590 (community factor scale) to 0.807 (child factor scale). The scores on the nurse, husband/partner, and hospital factor scales were significantly higher for nurses with high than with low fertility intentions.
conclusionsThese results support the reliability and validity of the nurse, husband/partner, and hospital factor scales. The child, nursing unit, and community factor scales can be further improved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.