ArticleAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2025
Unveiling antimicrobial stewardship competence among Italian nurses: results from a nationwide survey.
Article in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Knowledge, Practices, and Attitudes Regarding Antimicrobial Resistance and Antibiotic Use Among Hospital Staff: Findings from a Two-Round Cross-Sectional Survey in an Italian Tertiary Care Hospital.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Knowledge, attitudes and behaviours of nurses about antibiotic use and antibiotic resistance in Oman.PloS one · 2026Article
- Evidence-based nursing to reduce polypharmacy risks in older cholecystectomy patients.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe development of nursing competencies in antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) is influenced by a two-dimensional model, encompassing both internal and environmental factors. In the context of Italian clinical nursing, this study aims to assess and measure these aspects.
methodsEmploying a cross-sectional online survey design, nurses from various clinical specialties in Italy were involved. The questionnaire assessed individual variables, knowledge, attitudes, practices, as well as structural and process-related variables influencing AMS. Statistical analyses were performed, encompassing descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, and multiple linear regression.
resultsA total of 1,651 nurses aswered the survey, with a participation rate of 50.8%. The participant demographic revealed that 77% were female, and they had an average of 15 years of experience. Workplace and regional factors were found to significantly impact both AMS practices and attitudes. Surgical nurses reported higher practices scores (β = 0.467, P <.01), while critical care nurses scored lower (β= -0.398, P <.01). Regarding perceptions of structure, workplace characteristics significantly influenced nurses' scores, indicating lower perceptions among surgical nurses compared to their medical counterparts (β= -0.315, P <.01).
conclusionsThe study reveals the intricate interplay between internal and external factors that impact nurses' AMS competence. This underscores the urgent need for targeted interventions and education initiatives to enhance nurses' AMS competencies. Specifically, addressing variations in settings and nurses' behaviours becomes imperative for achieving improved patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.