ArticleHealth services research2025
Patient-Provider Race Concordance and Primary Care Suicide Risk Screening in the Veterans Health Administration.
Article in Health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Patient-Provider Race Concordance and Primary Care Suicide Risk Screening in the Veterans Health Administration.Health services research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the association between patient-provider race concordance and the likelihood of being screened for suicide risk in Veterans Health Administration (VA) primary care settings. STUDY SETTING AND
designIn November 2020, the VA expanded its national suicide risk identification strategy to include an annual universal suicide screening requirement. This study examined VA primary care visits from 2021 to 2022, where provider race and ethnicity could be identified. We examined the association between patient-provider race concordance and the probability of being screened for suicide risk, adjusting for patient and visit characteristics. Importantly, we also adjusted for provider fixed effects, which allowed us to estimate the effect of race concordant vs. non-concordant patient interactions for the same provider. We additionally conducted analyses stratified by provider race and ethnicity. DATA SOURCES AND ANALYTIC SAMPLE: Patient visit data were extracted from the VA Corporate Data Warehouse. The analytic sample comprised 219,673 primary care visits and 196,968 unique patients. PRINCIPAL
findingsSixty-two percent of all patients due for a screening were screened. Black patients had the lowest unadjusted screening rate of 58%. In adjusted analyses, we found that Black patients were 1.2 percentage points less likely to be screened compared to White patients (95% CI: -0.016, -0.008). Patient-provider race concordance was associated with a 0.4 percentage points higher likelihood of suicide screening (95% CI: 0.0002, 0.008). This small effect size represents 880 suicide screens and 33% of the Black-White screening gap. In separate analyses stratified by provider race and ethnicity, White providers were less likely to screen racially minoritized patients, and Hispanic and Asian providers were less likely to screen Black patients compared to White patients.
conclusionsPatient-provider race concordance was associated with increased suicide screens. Despite the small absolute increase in screening, health systems should consider the role of race concordance in patient-provider interactions when developing strategies to aid nationwide efforts to prevent suicides.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.