Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39988323›Full record

ArticleWater environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation2025

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in untreated and treated sludge/biosolids from 27 water resource recovery facilities across the United States and Canada.

Shubhashini Oza, Hui Li, Qingguo Huang, John W Norton, Lloyd J Winchell, Martha J M Wells, Thomas Nangle, Natalia Perez, Dan DeLaughter, Jan M Hauser and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Fate of PFAS Through a Biosolids Drum Dryer With Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer Emissions Control.Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Shubhashini OzaResearch and Innovation Group, Brown and Caldwell, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7890-1330
Hui LiDepartment of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3298-5265
Qingguo HuangDepartment of Crop and Soil Science, University of Georgia, Griffin, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8863-9404
John W NortonGreat Lakes Water Authority, Detroit, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9792-2380
Lloyd J WinchellSolids and Energy Group, Brown and Caldwell, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1666-8681
Martha J M WellsEnviroChem Services, Cookeville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2230-3630
Thomas NangleSolids and Energy Group, Brown and Caldwell, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Natalia PerezNew York City Environmental Protection Bureau of Wastewater Treatment, New York, New York, USA.
Dan DeLaughterSouth Platte Renew, Englewood, Colorado, USA.
Jan M HauserPublics Works Department, City of Oxnard, Oxnard, California, USA.
Malcolm TaylorDepartment of Operational Reliability and Resilience, WSSC Water, Laurel, Maryland, USA.
Zonetta E EnglishLouisville and Jefferson County MSD, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
Mike MelnykGary L. Kron Water Reclamation Facility, Lake County Regional Sewer District, Painesville, Ohio, USA.
Phuong TruongDNRP/WTD/WP - Process Control Group, King County, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Katherine Y BellBrown and Caldwell, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9039-7245

Funding

Brown and CaldwellGreat Lakes Water AuthorityUSEPA National Priorities Program 84025201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are being studied in all environmental matrices because of their ubiquitous presence and adverse human health impacts. This study conducted a surveillance of 27 water resource recovery facilities throughout the United States and Canada to screen the range of PFAS concentrations in pre-stabilized sludge and post-stabilized product. Among the 27 water resource recovery facilities, 82% use anaerobic digestion and the rest use chemical stabilization and/or incineration for sludge stabilization. Forty PFAS compounds were evaluated by US Environmental Protection Agency Method SW846/537.1, and four and nine compounds were reported in the pre-stabilized sludge and post-stabilized product, respectively. Concentrations of reported compounds in pre-stabilized sludge and post-stabilized product varied from 5 to 33 ng/g dry basis and 2 to 220 ng/g dry basis, respectively. 3-Perfluoropentylpropanoic acid (5:3 FTCA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) were the most frequently observed compounds, and PFAS concentrations in the post-stabilized products were generally higher than the corresponding pre-stabilized sludge. PRACTITIONER POINTS: Among the 40 target PFAS, four were above reporting limit in the pre-stabilized sludge and nine in the post-stabilized product. Incineration ash (post-stabilized product) samples did not have any reportable PFAS. 5:3 FTCA and PFOS were the two frequently observed compounds; concentrations were higher in the post-stabilized product compared to the pre-stabilized sludge. PFPeA and PFHxA were the only two short chain perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids reported. PFOA was reported in only one of the 54 samples evaluated.

Indexed as

FluorocarbonsSewageWaste Disposal, FluidWater Pollutants, ChemicalCanadaEnvironmental MonitoringUnited StatesFluorocarbonsSewageWater Pollutants, Chemical5:3 FTCAanaerobic digestionemerging contaminantsmethod SW846/537.1PFOSsurvey

Identifiers

PMID39988323
PMCPMC11847621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.