ArticleBiomedical journal2025
A newly designed flexible hydrated-hardening bone graft (FHBG) promotes bone regeneration and in vivo calvarial repair.
Article in Biomedical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAutologous bone remains the gold standard for surgical bone reconstruction but presents clinical challenges like donor site complications and operational difficulties.
methodWe investigate the osteogenic effects of a newly designed, ceramic and collagen-based, submicron-processed Flexible Hydrated-Hardening Bone Graft (FHBG), using both murine and human mesenchymal stem cells. We also compare the efficacy and safety of FHBG with a commercially available (CA) graft in New Zealand white rabbits with cranial bone defects. Rabbits were divided into three groups: no graft, CA, and FHBG, and evaluated using Micro-CT and histological analysis at three and six weeks post-surgery. Safety was assessed through blood samples.
resultsIn vitro, FHBG promoted osteogenesis and upregulated osteogenic-associated genes in mesenchymal stem cells. In vivo, FHBG significantly enhanced bone regeneration, showing approximately 25% and 30% more improvement than the control at three and six weeks post-surgery. FHBG also had about half the residual content compared to the CA group. Blood analysis showed no hepatotoxicity or nephrotoxicity associated with the graft.
conclusionFHBG significantly promotes bone regeneration both in vitro and in vivo. Additionally, FHBG has been demonstrated to be safe, with fewer residuals remaining in the body compared to currently in-use clinical bone grafts. This study validates the ability of the newly designed FHBG to facilitate osteogenesis in vitro and demonstrates its efficacy and safety in new bone formation in vivo. The lower residual material further suggests a reduced long-term impact and associated risk with the graft.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.