ReviewJournal of biomechanics2025
Quantifying shoulder motion in the free-living environment using wearable inertial measurement units: Challenges and recommendations.
Review in Journal of biomechanics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Simple Minimum-Setup Pipeline for Using Leg-Worn Inertial Sensors to Track Knee Flexion: Validation on 10 Movements.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Body-worn inertial measurement units track knee flexion angles with similar accuracy to optical motion capture.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- The Reliability and Validity of an Instrumented Device for Tracking the Shoulder Range of Motion.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding function and dysfunction of the shoulder may be best addressed by capturing the motion of the shoulder in the unstructured, free-living environment where the magnitudes and frequencies of required daily motion can be quantified. Miniaturized wearable inertial measurement units (IMUs) enable measurement of shoulder motion in the free-living environment; however, there are challenges in using IMU-based data to estimate traditionally used measures of shoulder motion from lab-based motion capture. There are limited options for IMU placement/fixation that minimize soft tissue effects and there are significant challenges in developing the algorithms that can accurately estimate shoulder joint angles from IMU measurements of acceleration and angular velocity. In an effort to collate current knowledge and highlight solutions to addressable challenges, in this paper, we report the results of a focused search of research articles using IMUS for kinematic measurements of the shoulder in the free-living environment, discuss the basic steps required for quantifying shoulder motion in the non-laboratory field-based setting using wearable IMUs, and we discuss the challenges that must be overcome in the context of the shoulder joint and the literature review. Finally, we suggest some IMU-based measures that are less sensitive to experimental design and algorithm choices, make recommendations for the information documented in manuscripts describing studies that use IMUs to quantify shoulder motion, and propose directions for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.