ArticleUltrasonics sonochemistry2025
Optimization of the effect of cold plasma treatment on UAE-NADES green extraction of chickpea roots (Cicer arietinum) bioactive compounds.
Article in Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Plasma-Assisted Extraction of Polysaccharides fromPolymers · 2026Article
- Mechanistic insights into sonication-assisted cold plasma treatments for improved microbial decontamination and quality maintenance in perishable foods.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2026Review
- Direct vs indirect ultrasound-assisted extraction of phenolics from wild sumac (Rhus tripartita): Optimization by Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and LC-MS profiling.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2026Article
- Development and optimization of green extraction of naringin inRSC advances · 2025Article
- Functional Ingredients: From Molecule to Market-AI-Enabled Design, Bioavailability, Consumer Impact, and Clinical Evidence.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) root is an agricultural by-product with the potential for extracting valuable bioactive compounds that often remains underutilized. This study introduces an integrated extraction methodology to enhance the extraction of bioactives using atmospheric air low-pressure cold plasma (CP) treatment followed by ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) with natural deep eutectic solvents (NADES). Chickpea root powder was first subjected to CP treatment under optimized conditions (power, pressure, and time) identified via response surface methodology (RSM). Subsequently, UAE-NADES extraction was performed to maximize the results of antioxidant activity (DPPH) and total phenolic content (TPC). The integrated CP-UAE-NADES process enhanced TPC and DPPH compared to the untreated sample (non-CP). The optimum conditions were 11.5 min, 52 W, and 0.65 mbar. The predicted values of the Box-Behnken design for TPC and DPPH were compatible with the experimental Furthermore, microbial load reduction and color stability were analyzed to ensure chickpea root quality and functionality. The combined extraction methodology offers a sustainable and eco-friendly approach for the valorization of chickpea root as a source of bioactives, with potential applications in functional foods, nutraceuticals, and pharmaceuticals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.