Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39987533›Full record

ReviewEuropean radiology experimental2025

AI for image quality and patient safety in CT and MRI.

Luca Melazzini, Chandra Bortolotto, Leonardo Brizzi, Marina Achilli, Nicoletta Basla, Alessandro D'Onorio De Meo, Alessia Gerbasi, Olivia Maria Bottinelli, Riccardo Bellazzi, Lorenzo Preda

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European radiology experimental, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. AI model for automatic spinopelvic and spinal alignment parameters measurement from EOS.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Luca MelazziniDepartment of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Chandra BortolottoDepartment of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Leonardo BrizziDepartment of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy. leonardo.brizzi01@universitadipavia.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-7823-4667
Marina AchilliDepartment of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Nicoletta BaslaDepartment of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Alessandro D'Onorio De MeoDepartment of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Alessia GerbasiDepartment of Electrical, Computer and Biomedical Engineering, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Olivia Maria BottinelliDepartment of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Riccardo BellazziDepartment of Electrical, Computer and Biomedical Engineering, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Lorenzo PredaDepartment of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Substantial endeavors have been recently dedicated to developing artificial intelligence (AI) solutions, especially deep learning-based, tailored to enhance radiological procedures, in particular algorithms designed to minimize radiation exposure and enhance image clarity. Thus, not only better diagnostic accuracy but also reduced potential harm to patients was pursued, thereby exemplifying the intersection of technological innovation and the highest standards of patient care. We provide herein an overview of recent AI developments in computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Major AI results in CT regard: optimization of patient positioning, scan range selection (avoiding "overscanning"), and choice of technical parameters; reduction of the amount of injected contrast agent and injection flow rate (also avoiding extravasation); faster and better image reconstruction reducing noise level and artifacts. Major AI results in MRI regard: reconstruction of undersampled images; artifact removal, including those derived from unintentional patient's (or fetal) movement or from heart motion; up to 80-90% reduction of GBCA dose. Challenges include limited generalizability, lack of external validation, insufficient explainability of models, and opacity of decision-making. Developing explainable AI algorithms that provide transparent and interpretable outputs is essential to enable seamless AI integration into CT and MRI practice. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This review highlights how AI-driven advancements in CT and MRI improve image quality and enhance patient safety by leveraging AI solutions for dose reduction, contrast optimization, noise reduction, and efficient image reconstruction, paving the way for safer, faster, and more accurate diagnostic imaging practices. KEY POINTS: Advancements in AI are revolutionizing the way radiological images are acquired, reconstructed, and interpreted. AI algorithms can assist in optimizing radiation doses, reducing scan times, and enhancing image quality. AI techniques are paving the way for a future of more efficient, accurate, and safe medical imaging examinations.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMagnetic Resonance ImagingPatient SafetyTomography, X-Ray ComputedHumansArtificial intelligenceImage processing (computer-assisted)Patient carePatient safetyRadiation dosage

Identifiers

PMID39987533
PMCPMC11847764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.