ArticleFuture oncology (London, England)2025
NALIRIFOX in Japanese treatment-naïve patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: an open-label, phase II trial design.
Article in Future oncology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- NALIRIFOX in Japanese treatment-naïve patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: results from an open-label, phase II study.ESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This is a single arm, open label trial to assess the safety and efficacy of NALIRIFOX in Japanese participants who have not previously received therapy for metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Forty-one participants will receive the treatment NALIRIFOX (liposomal irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, levoleucovorin and oxaliplatin) until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Anti-tumor activity will be evaluated in terms of objective response rate according to RECIST v1.1 by independent central review. Safety will be carefully monitored, with a dedicated Safety Monitoring Committee reviewing the data from the initial six participants to safeguard the well-being of all individuals involved in the study. Other evaluations will include pharmacokinetics and the relationship between mutations in the UGT1A1 genes and safety. This study aims to show that the results of the NAPOLI 3 study in the global population can be reproduced in the Japanese population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.