Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39987449›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2025

Development of a patient assessment to meet the needs of patients suffering from advanced non-oncological diseases - the KOPAL trial.

Gabriella Marx, Tina Mallon, Henrikje Stanze, Manuel Zimansky, Nils Schneider, Friedemann Nauck, Martin Scherer, Nadine Pohontsch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gabriella MarxDepartment of General Practice and Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, Hamburg, 20246, Germany. g.marx@uke.de.ORCID 0000-0001-6807-9518
Tina MallonDepartment of General Practice and Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, Hamburg, 20246, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5849-6377
Henrikje StanzeDepartment 3, Hochschule Bremen, City University of Applied Sciences, Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3563-069X
Manuel ZimanskyInstitute for General Practice and Palliative Care, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7764-9292
Nils SchneiderInstitute for General Practice and Palliative Care, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7242-8298
Friedemann NauckDepartment of Palliative Medicine, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7592-1654
Martin SchererDepartment of General Practice and Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, Hamburg, 20246, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3448-9679
Nadine PohontschDepartment of General Practice and Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, Hamburg, 20246, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0966-4087

Funding

This work was supported by the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) 01VSF18024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients suffering from progressive non-oncologic chronic diseases are primarily treated in primary care. Early integration of palliative care (PC) can improve patients' quality of life and reduce burdensome physical symptoms. To guide interprofessional counselling between GPs and specialist palliative home care teams, we developed an aide memoire for patients diagnosed with advanced non-oncological chronic diseases, the KOPAL conversation guide, as part of the KOPAL trial. The aim of this study was to ensure the conversation guide covers all relevant care aspects in order to reveal individual gaps and needs in healthcare.

methodsWe conducted three focus groups including four patients, seven health care providers, and five stakeholders. During each group, a draft of the conversation guide was discussed, revised, and consented from the respective perspectives.

resultsThe final KOPAL conversation guide contains eight key topics: living with the illness, physical, emotional, personal, and social situation, information and communication, control and autonomy, emergency management. Each topic refers to a number of related subtopics listed in each respective thematic section. The conversation should start with the introductory question referring to the patient's current well-being. At the end, patients are asked to state their primary concern based on the conversation.

conclusionsThe KOPAL conversation guide is a broad evaluation and communication tool. It covers potential PC needs of non-oncological patients and provides a basis for interprofessional case planning, and counselling. Applying the guide may help to bridge gaps in communication between general and specialist PC professionals as well as between professionals and patients.

Indexed as

Needs AssessmentPalliative CareAgedChronic DiseaseCommunicationFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareQuality of LifeDecision-makingPalliative carePrimary careProvider-patient communication

Identifiers

PMID39987449
PMCPMC11846271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.