Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39987421›Full record

ReviewPain and therapy2025

Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Postoperative Analgesic Techniques in Thoracoscopic Lung Resection Patients.

Fang Yue, Yongye Xie, Xiangdong Chen, Ruifen Xu, Hui Wang, Ning Bai, Minna Hou, Jiao Guo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pain and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fang Yue *Department of Anesthesiology, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, No.256, Youyi West Road, Beilin District, Xi'an, 710000, China.
Yongye Xie *Department of Anesthesiology, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, No.256, Youyi West Road, Beilin District, Xi'an, 710000, China.
Xiangdong Chen *Department of Anesthesiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, No.1277, Jiefang Avenue, JangHan District, Wu Han, 430000, China.
Ruifen XuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, No.256, Youyi West Road, Beilin District, Xi'an, 710000, China.
Hui WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, No.256, Youyi West Road, Beilin District, Xi'an, 710000, China.
Ning BaiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, No.256, Youyi West Road, Beilin District, Xi'an, 710000, China.
Minna HouDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, No.256, Youyi West Road, Beilin District, Xi'an, 710000, China.
Jiao GuoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, No.256, Youyi West Road, Beilin District, Xi'an, 710000, China. guojane1989@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3505-9825

Funding

Research Incubation Fund of Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital 2023YJY-32the Scientific and Technological Talent Support Program 2023JY-37
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPostoperative analgesia in thoracoscopic lung resection is crucial, with several nerve block techniques-including thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA), paravertebral block (PVB), erector spinae plane block (ESPB), intercostal nerve block (INB), and serratus anterior plane block (SAPB)-commonly employed. However, there remains ongoing debate regarding the optimal technique.

methodsTo evaluate and compare the effectiveness of these analgesia methods, a systematic review was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, identifying relevant randomized clinical trials (RCTs). A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed to assess postoperative pain management, with subgroup analyses and meta-regression conducted to examine key factors influencing outcomes, such as the risk of bias, continuous catheter analgesia, and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA).

resultsThe results revealed that for 12-h resting visual analog scale (VAS) scores, the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) ranking was TEA > PVB > ESPB > control > INB > SAPB, whereas at 24 h, it shifted to PVB > TEA > ESPB > INB > control > SAPB. For 12-h coughing VAS scores, TEA ranked highest, followed by PVB, SAPB, ESPB, and control. At 24 h, PVB ranked highest, followed by TEA, ESPB, SAPB, INB, and control. The inconsistency test showed good consistency, with minimal publication bias, and meta-regression revealed that neither study quality nor local anesthetic infiltration at the incision site significantly impacted the outcomes. Excluding studies without PCA did not change the SUCRA rankings. PVB consistently ranked highest for 24-h resting and coughing VAS scores. Clustered ranking plots indicated that PVB and ESPB were the most suitable techniques for postoperative analgesia.

conclusionPVB and ESPB emerged as the most suitable analgesic techniques for thoracoscopic lung resection. While PVB showed superior analgesic efficacy, ESPB offered fewer side effects, providing a safety advantage. TEA was considered less suitable due to its excessive side effects.

Indexed as

ESPBINBPVBSAPBTEAThoracoscopic lung resection

Identifiers

PMID39987421
PMCPMC11914711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.