ArticleArchives of dermatological research2025
Skin of color representation in cosmetic dermatology literature, 2018-2023.
Article in Archives of dermatological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dermatoscopic Assessment of Nail Fold Capillary Patterns in Patients of Color with Different Autoimmune Connective Tissue Diseases.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2026Article
- Scar Quality After Burns in Relation to Skin Type, Classified by Device-Based Colour Measurement, as an Alternative for the Fitzpatrick Questionnaire.International wound journal · 2025Article
- Implementation and Impact of a Dermoscopy-Enabled Dermatology eConsult Application in Primary Care.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Growing racial diversity raises concerns about equitable dermatology care. Only 4.5% of US medical textbooks include diverse skin types, and dermatologic literature lacks focus on Skin of Color (SOC). This study examines SOC cosmetic research in five dermatology journals. Articles from Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, Cosmetics, Lasers in Medical Science, and Clinical, Cosmetic, and Investigational Dermatology (September 2018 - September 2023) were screened for cosmetic interventions on SOC, defined as studies with > 50% non-Caucasian patients. Studies without defined race or Fitzpatrick skin type (FST) were excluded. Article type, race, ethnicity, research country, and FST were recorded. Of 5,175 screened articles, 561 (10.84%) met inclusion criteria, and 214 (4.14%) provided FST data. FST 3 (40.74%) and 4 (40.53%) were most represented. East Asian (57.75%) and Middle Eastern-North African (24.06%) ethnicities were most represented, with most research from East Asia (56.15%). SOC articles often lacked specific FST details, focusing on hair issues and came mostly from predominantly Caucasian countries. There is significant underrepresentation of SOC in cosmetic dermatology research, with bias toward FSTs 3, 4 and East Asian populations. This highlights the need for standardized ethnicity reporting and inclusive research to ensure equitable dermatologic care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39987416What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.