ArticleScientific reports2025
Enhanced recognition and counting of high-coverage Amorphophallus konjac by integrating UAV RGB imagery and deep learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- FG-LCNet: A two-stage foreground-guided network for whole-tree litchi counting.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in thyroid ultrasound: clinical applications and perspectives.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- DASNet a dual branch multi level attention sheep counting network.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate counting of Amorphophallus konjac (Konjac) plants can offer valuable insights for agricultural management and yield prediction. While current studies have primarily focused on detecting and counting crop plants during the early stages of low coverage, there is limited investigation into the later stages of high coverage, which could impact the accuracy of forecasting yield. High canopy coverage and severe occlusion in later stages pose significant challenges for plant detection and counting. Therefore, this study evaluated the performance of the Count Crops tool and a deep learning (DL) model derived from early-stage unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery in detecting and counting Konjac plants during the high-coverage growth stage. Additionally, the study proposed an approach that integrates the DL model with Konjac location information from both early-stage and high canopy coverage stage imagery to improve the accuracy of recognizing Konjac plants during the high canopy coverage stage. The results indicated that the Count Crops tool outperformed the DL model constructed solely from early-stage imagery in detecting and counting Konjac plants during the high-coverage period. However, given the single stem and erect growth characteristics of Konjac, incorporating the DL model with the location information of the Konjac plants achieved the highest accuracy (Precision = 98.7%, Recall = 86.7%, F1-score = 92.3%). Our findings indicate that combining DL detection results from the early growth stages of Konjac, along with plant positional information from both growth stages, not only significantly improved the accuracy of detecting and counting plants but also saved time on annotating and training DL samples in the later stages. This study introduces an innovative approach for detecting and counting Konjac plants during high-coverage periods, providing a new perspective for recognizing and counting other crop plants at high-overlapping growth stages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.