ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2025
Apixaban versus warfarin for treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with severe renal impairment: a multicenter study.
Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anticoagulation in Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease: Navigating Uncertainty.Turkish journal of haematology : official journal of Turkish Society of Haematology · 2026Review
- Scoping review of apixaban and rivaroxaban dosing for atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism in advanced chronic kidney disease.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Limited evidence exists regarding the use of factor Xa inhibitors for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with severe renal impairment. Notably, these patients were excluded from clinical trials.The goal of this study was to examine the safety and effectiveness of apixaban versus warfarin for the treatment of acute VTE in patients with severe renal impairment.This retrospective cohort study was conducted across 36 Ascension Health sites between 2014 and 2024. Adult patients receiving apixaban or warfarin for VTE treatment with severe renal impairment were included. The primary outcome was time to composite bleeding event within six months.This study included 1200 patients receiving apixaban and 600 patients receiving warfarin. Overall, 23.4% of the study population had ESRD requiring renal replacement therapy. Among patients not requiring renal replacement therapy, stage IV CKD was most common (43.8%). No difference in time to composite bleeding events (HR 1.01; 95% CI 0.74-1.38, p = 0.97) or recurrent VTE (HR 1.24; 95% CI 0.70-2.18, p = 0.46) were noted after controlling for confounders. Furthermore, major bleeding (4.7% vs. 7.5%, p = 0.43) and clinically-relevant non-major bleeding (4.3% vs. 6.2%, p = 0.08) were similar between groups. Apixaban was associated with a significantly reduced incidence of anticoagulation-related ED admission (6.8% vs. 9.8%, p = 0.02) compared to warfarin. Anticoagulation-related readmission (7.4% vs. 8%, p = 0.66) and time to all-cause mortality (5.2% vs. 6.2%, p = 0.38) were similar between groups.No differences in safety or effectiveness were noted between apixaban and warfarin, providing encouraging evidence to support the use of apixaban for treatment of acute VTE in patients with severe renal impairment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39987314What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.