ArticleScientific reports2025
Modeling and control of functional electrical stimulation cycling training system.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- New insights into translational research in Alzheimer's disease guided by artificial intelligence, computational and systems biology.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Functional electrical stimulation (FES), a rehabilitation technique, typically relies on physiotherapists using trial-and-error tests to determine effective stimulation patterns. Therefore, this study proposed a kind of pedal hill modeling to establish an optimal stimulus mode with the maximum torque efficiency optimization objective. This study also proposed a new model based on the particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm, the back propagation (BP) neural network algorithm, and the proportional integral derivative (PID) control composite algorithm. Six participants were recruited for the experiment. Using the proposed modeling method, we found an appropriate stimulation mode for each of the six subjects, and then each subject performed three sets of experiments for cycling without electrical stimulation, cycling with fixed pulse width, and cycling with adaptive adjustment of pulse width by the fabricated controller. The results of the study showed that root mean square error (RMSE), average (AVE), training time and number of stops all performed well compared to the no control and fixed control conditions and the adaptive pulse width control system of the fabricated controller allows subjects to train at a longer continuous running time and a more stable cycling training speed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.