Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39987268›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Innovative application of graphene nanoplatelet-based ionanofluids as heat transfer fluid in hybrid photovoltaic-thermal solar collectors.

I Moulefera, J J Delgado Marín, A Cascales, M G Montalbán, M Alarcón, G Víllora

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

I MouleferaChemical Engineering Department, Faculty of Chemistry, Regional Campus of International Excellence "Campus Mare Nostrum", University of Murcia, 30071, Murcia, Spain.
J J Delgado MarínChemical Engineering Department, Faculty of Chemistry, Regional Campus of International Excellence "Campus Mare Nostrum", University of Murcia, 30071, Murcia, Spain. josejavier.delgado@um.es.
A CascalesChemical Engineering Department, Faculty of Chemistry, Regional Campus of International Excellence "Campus Mare Nostrum", University of Murcia, 30071, Murcia, Spain.
M G MontalbánChemical Engineering Department, Faculty of Chemistry, Regional Campus of International Excellence "Campus Mare Nostrum", University of Murcia, 30071, Murcia, Spain.
M AlarcónElectromagnetism and Electronics Department, International Campus of Excellence in the European Context (CEIR) Campus Mare Nostrum, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
G VílloraChemical Engineering Department, Faculty of Chemistry, Regional Campus of International Excellence "Campus Mare Nostrum", University of Murcia, 30071, Murcia, Spain.

Funding

Fundación Séneca 22129-PI-22Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación TED2021-130389B-C21Ministerio de Universidades Margarita Salas
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ongoing pursuit of efficient solar thermal energy systems has driven significant interest in the development of advanced nanofluids, particularly those utilizing carbon-based nanostructures such as graphene nanoplatelets (GNP) and carbon nanotubes (CNTs). These materials, when dispersed in base fluids like water or ionic liquids, have gained attention for their tunable thermophysical properties, including thermal conductivity, viscosity, and specific heat capacity. This has positioned them as promising candidates for enhancing the thermal performance of solar collectors. However, literature examining direct experimental comparisons between the thermophysical behavior of GNP-based and CNT-based nanofluids, particularly in both water and ionic liquid media, remains sparse. Similarly, studies evaluating how such nanofluids affect the overall efficiency of solar collectors are limited and fragmented. This study investigates, for the first time, the application of GNP-based ionanofluids (INFs) in commercial hybrid photovoltaic-thermal (PVT) solar collectors. INFs were prepared using GNP and 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate ([Emim] Ac) ionic liquid. Their thermophysical properties, including density, viscosity, thermal conductivity, and specific heat capacity, were comprehensively characterized. Long-term stability was also assessed to ensure consistent performance over time. Comparative tests with water and pure ionic liquid as base fluids revealed that INFs exhibited a significantly higher temperature rise within the collector, attributed to their lower specific heat capacity. This resulted in an exergy efficiency improvement of over 5% compared to the ionic liquid alone, underscoring the potential of INFs as advanced heat transfer fluids for high-temperature solar systems. These findings highlight the novelty of using GNP-based INFs in solar applications and pave the way for future research in optimizing nanofluid compositions for renewable energy systems.

Indexed as

Exergy efficiencyGraphene nanoplateletsHeat transfer fluidsIonanofluidsIonic liquidPhotovoltaic-thermal systems (PVT)Solar collectorsThermal conductivity

Identifiers

PMID39987268
PMCPMC11846970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.