ArticleScientific reports2025
Provably secure and lightweight blockchain based cross hospital authentication scheme for IoMT-based healthcare.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- SELAM: selective ECC-based lightweight authentication for the internet of medical things.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Multimodal Wearable Biosensing Meets Multidomain AI: A Pathway to Decentralized Healthcare.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Machine Learning-Powered Smart Healthcare Systems in the Era of Big Data: Applications, Diagnostic Insights, Challenges, and Ethical Implications.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Portable devices and sensors-based Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) healthcare can remotely detect patients' physiological data and provide first-class healthcare services. However, the high privacy and sensitivity of medical data make IoMT healthcare systems vulnerable to various attacks. While numerous authentication protocols have been introduced in recent years to guarantee authorized access, these schemes continue to face challenges such as privacy disclosure, untraceability of malicious behavior, insufficient cross-hospital access, and concerns related to single points of failure and trust. To address these issues, we propose a Double Anonymity Strategy to hide identities between doctors and the patients while allowing the authorized party to track their malicious behavior, enhance users' privacy and track malicious users. Our approach leverages the advantages of blockchain, such as decentralization, and replaces trusted third parties with smart contracts for efficient and automatic identity authentication. Additionally, we introduce a cross-hospital authentication scheme that incorporates three-factor secrecy, ensuring that even if any two of the three factors (device, biometric information and password) are compromised, the security of the proposed scheme will not be affected. The security of our scheme is formally proven under the random oracle model, which formally measures that the probability of an adversary breaking the scheme is negligible. We also provide informal security analysis showing that our scheme prevents privacy breaches, achieves decentralization, and addresses existing various attacks. Furthermore, through simulation of the proposed scheme and comparison with related works, we demonstrate that our scheme achieves 23% to 87% reduction in computational cost while maintaining higher security properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.