Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39987243›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Semi-supervised tissue segmentation from histopathological images with consistency regularization and uncertainty estimation.

G V S Sudhamsh, S Girisha, R Rashmi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

G V S Sudhamsh *Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology Bengaluru, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
S Girisha *Department of Data Science and Computer Applications, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
R RashmiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology Bengaluru, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India. r.rashmi@manipal.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pathologists have depended on their visual experience to assess tissue structures in smear images, which was time-consuming, error-prone, and inconsistent. Deep learning, particularly Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), offers the ability to automate this procedure by recognizing patterns in tissue images. However, training these models necessitates huge amounts of labeled data, which can be difficult to come by due to the skill required for annotation and the unavailability of data, particularly for rare diseases. This work introduces a new semi-supervised method for tissue structure semantic segmentation in histopathological images. The study presents a CNN based teacher model that generates pseudo-labels to train a student model, aiming to overcome the drawbacks of conventional supervised learning approaches. Self-supervised training is used to improve the teacher model's performance on smaller datasets. Consistency regularization is integrated to efficiently train the student model on labeled data. Further, the study uses Monte Carlo dropout to estimate the uncertainty of proposed model. The proposed model demonstrated promising results by achieving an mIoU score of 0.64 on a public dataset, highlighting its potential to improve segmentation accuracy in histopathological image analysis.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedSupervised Machine LearningAlgorithmsDeep LearningHumansNeural Networks, ComputerUncertaintyComputer Aided Diagnostic SystemsDeep LearningHistopathological Image AnalysisSemantic SegmentationSemi-Supervised Learning

Identifiers

PMID39987243
PMCPMC11846888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.