ArticleScientific reports2025
Improving Malaria diagnosis through interpretable customized CNNs architectures.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning applications in parasite microscopy: A scoping review.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- Deep learning-assisted malaria microscopy with sensitivity-aware threshold optimization.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Trustworthy deep learning for malaria diagnosis using explainable artificial intelligence.Scientific reports · 2025Review
- Deep learning with refined single candidate optimizer for early polyp detection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Web based AI-driven framework combining multi-modal data with CNN and LLM for Parkinson's disease diagnosis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Malaria, which is spread via female Anopheles mosquitoes and is brought on by the Plasmodium parasite, persists as a serious illness, especially in areas with a high mosquito density. Traditional detection techniques, like examining blood samples with a microscope, tend to be labor-intensive, unreliable and necessitate specialized individuals. To address these challenges, we employed several customized convolutional neural networks (CNNs), including Parallel convolutional neural network (PCNN), Soft Attention Parallel Convolutional Neural Networks (SPCNN), and Soft Attention after Functional Block Parallel Convolutional Neural Networks (SFPCNN), to improve the effectiveness of malaria diagnosis. Among these, the SPCNN emerged as the most successful model, outperforming all other models in evaluation metrics. The SPCNN achieved a precision of 99.38 ± 0.21%, recall of 99.37 ± 0.21%, F1 score of 99.37 ± 0.21%, accuracy of 99.37 ± 0.30%, and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 99.95 ± 0.01%, demonstrating its robustness in detecting malaria parasites. Furthermore, we employed various transfer learning (TL) algorithms, including VGG16, ResNet152, MobileNetV3Small, EfficientNetB6, EfficientNetB7, DenseNet201, Vision Transformer (ViT), Data-efficient Image Transformer (DeiT), ImageIntern, and Swin Transformer (versions v1 and v2). The proposed SPCNN model surpassed all these TL methods in every evaluation measure. The SPCNN model, with 2.207 million parameters and a size of 26 MB, is more complex than PCNN but simpler than SFPCNN. Despite this, SPCNN exhibited the fastest testing times (0.00252 s), making it more computationally efficient than both PCNN and SFPCNN. We assessed model interpretability using feature activation maps, Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) visualizations for all three architectures, illustrating why SPCNN outperformed the others. The findings from our experiments show a significant improvement in malaria parasite diagnosis. The proposed approach outperforms traditional manual microscopy in terms of both accuracy and speed. This study highlights the importance of utilizing cutting-edge technologies to develop robust and effective diagnostic tools for malaria prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.