ArticleCurrent microbiology2025
Decoding Codon Usage Patterns in High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Genomes: A Comprehensive Analysis.
Article in Current microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Codon usage bias of low-risk human papillomavirus types 6 and 11.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · 2025Article
- Codon Usage Pattern of Papillomavirus E6, E7, and L1 Genes Across Hosts.Current microbiology · 2025Article
- Translational regulation of human papillomavirus mRNAs in carcinogenesis: old questions and new insights.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human Papillomavirus (HPV) is a major contributor to various human cancers, particularly cervical cancer. Despite its significant impact, the codon usage bias in high-risk HPV types has not been extensively studied. Understanding this bias, however, could provide valuable insights into the virus itself and inform the optimization of vaccine design. This study explores codon usage bias within the genomes of 17 high-risk HPV types (HPV-16, 18, 26, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 53, 56, 58, 59, 66, 68, and 82) through comparative analysis. While overall codon usage preference across these genotypes is not highly significant, a notable trend emerges in the preference for codons ending in A or U, with 24 out of 26 favored codons (Relative Synonymous Codon Usage > 1) ending in A or U. Moreover, no common optimal codons are shared among the 17 genomes. The study also identifies the underrepresentation of CpG and ApA dinucleotides, alongside the overrepresentation of CpA and UpG, which likely contribute to codon usage preferences that may influence viral replication and immune evasion strategies. Integrated analysis further suggests that natural selection is the primary force driving codon usage bias in these high-risk HPV genomes. Additionally, these HPVs exhibit a limited set of favored codons shared with humans, potentially minimizing competition for translation resources. This study offers new insights into codon usage bias in high-risk HPVs and underscores the importance of this understanding for optimizing vaccine design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39987223What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.