ArticleScientific reports2025
Controllability of nonlinear epileptic-seizure spreading dynamics in large-scale subject-specific brain networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Passive neuromodulation: an energy-driven mechanism for closed-loop suppression of epileptic seizures.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Designing Neural Dynamics: From Digital Twin Modeling to Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Closed-loop electrical stimulation has become an important alternative to resective surgery for control of pharmacologically-resistant focal epileptic seizures. Seizure spread across large-scale brain networks, rather than its focal onset, is what commonly leads to major disruptions in sensorimotor and cognitive processing, as well as loss-of-consciousness, one of the main impairing aspects of the disorder. Electrical stimulation, triggered by early detection of seizure onset in epileptogenic zones (EZs), has been applied to prevent spread and its subsequent effects. Here, we show how linear feedback seizure-spread controllability in subject-specific (white-matter tractography) Epileptor network models is affected by variations in brain excitability, network coupling strength, control latency and gain, and actuation targets. Feedback control can qualitatively change the nonlinear seizure dynamics, and the paths to seizure termination and spread prevention. Notably, control onset latency is a critical parameter leading to a phase transition in spread controllability. Consequently, the efficacy of EZ-only actuation is limited depending on network excitability, coupling strength, and practical latencies for detection and actuation. Additional feedback-stabilization control of theoretically-derived optimal node subsets in the network are necessary for spread prevention. Finally, we contrast our linear-feedback controllability assessment with other measures based on minimum-energy (Gramian) controllability and nonlinear pulse-perturbation approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.