ArticleMalaria journal2025
Identifying malaria risks amongst forest going populations in Mondulkiri province and Kampong Speu province, Cambodia: a large cross-sectional survey.
Article in Malaria journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCambodia strives to eliminate all species of human malaria by 2025, requiring that foci among forest-exposed populations in remote settings be addressed. This study explores malaria risks amongst forest-exposed groups in Mondulkiri and Kampong Speu Provinces, Cambodia as part of a multi-stage study on novel mosquito bite prevention tools (Project BITE).
methodsA serial cross-sectional survey explored the demographics, housing structure openness, mosquito bite prevention habits, and protection from malaria amongst three target groups: forest goers who work in the forest, forest dwellers who live in the forest, and forest rangers who patrol forested regions. Malaria prevalence data was collected at three time points using rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for febrile individuals and qPCR for all participants. Infection locations and travel patterns of Plasmodium falciparum-infected individuals were analysed for clustering and the potential movement of infections.
results2935 participants were enrolled between October 2022 and February 2023, consisting of 1093 (37%) forest goers and 1787 (61%) forest dwellers across both provinces, and 55 (5%) forest rangers in Mondulkiri province. Most worked outdoors as farmers, day labourers, and forest collectors, and reported going to the forest five to seven days a week. For housing, 29% and 39% of participants reported living in partially open primary and secondary structures, respectively. The main methods of mosquito bite protection used were insecticide-treated nets, wearing long sleeves, and burning mosquito coils, with limited protection during the daytime and outside at night. All febrile individuals had negative RDT test results. For qPCR, 24 P. falciparum infections (< 1%) were detected among forest goers and dwellers, clustered in Pu Trom and Pu Nhav villages in Mondulkiri Province, and Banteay Roka and Banteay Roka Kirisenchey (M) villages in Kampong Speu Province. Plasmodium vivax cases were detected (216 cases, 5%) across all enrolled villages. Only two infections were found in forest rangers.
conclusionMalaria elimination strategies for forest-exposed populations in Cambodia should focus on vector intervention strategies that offer protection during the day and outside at night, and drug-based strategies to clear subpatent infections, targeting forest goers and dwellers in villages where cases are detected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.