ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
Routine evaluation of supracondylar humerus fracture percutaneous pin sites does not decrease complications: a retrospective comparative cohort.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSupracondylar humerus (SCH) fractures are the most common type of pediatric elbow fractures that require surgical intervention. Studies suggest limiting the first postoperative visit to the time of pin removal or limiting radiographs at first postoperative follow-up may not increase complication rates, but few comparative studies exist. This study aims to determine if routinely examining surgical pins sites at the first postoperative visits affects the complication rates or outcomes compared to only evaluating pin sites if a clinical indication exists.
methodsThis cohort study retrospectively reviewed patients who were surgically treated for a supracondylar humerus fracture at a Pediatric Level 1 Trauma Hospital from 2011-2017. Clinical records and surgical reports were reviewed, and data was extracted to determine fracture type, surgical treatment, and postoperative course. Complications were recorded.
resultsThree hundred and fifty-five patients were included; 138 patients had a routine pin evaluation at first postoperative visit, 183 had no pin evaluation until time of pin removal, and 34 had a clinical indication for pin site evaluation at the initial postoperative visit. No patients in the routine pin evaluation or the no early pin evaluation group had a loss of reduction. In the clinical indication group, three patients returned to the operating room (8.82%) due to a loss of reduction, as determined by radiographs. No significant differences were found in healing outcomes or complications between the group that had a routine evaluation versus the group that did not.
conclusionRoutine pin site evaluation in the initial postoperative setting after closed or open reduction and pinning of supracondylar humerus fractures without clinical indication does not lead to fewer complication, return to operating room, or improved outcomes. The initial dressing and immobilization can be continued until pin removal unless clinical/radiographic indication to evaluate pin sites exists. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.