ArticleScientific reports2025
A new cut-off value of FRAX tools as an osteoporosis screening tool for Thai geriatric population.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comment on: The effect of hypersensitive C-reactive protein to albumin ratio on the risk of fragility fracture in the Chinese male population.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025Article
- Author response to: OSIN-D-25-00317, "Comment on: The effect of hypersensitive C-reactive protein to albumin ratio on the risk of fragility fracture in the Chinese male population".Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025Article
- Serum creatinine, genetic susceptibility, and the risk of osteoporosis and fracture: a prospective cohort study from the UK Biobank.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identifying osteoporosis in geriatric populations is essential for fragility fracture prevention. While dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) remains the gold standard for diagnosing osteoporosis, its availability and cost for mass screening are limited. This study aims to determine an effective fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) cut-off value for screening osteoporosis in the Thai geriatric population. The demographic data, FRAX hip fracture (HF), major osteoporotic fracture (MOF), and Bone mineral density (BMD) of community-dwelling Thai adults aged ≥ 60 years, conducted between March 2021 to August 2022 were analyzed. Osteoporosis is defined as a BMD T-score ≤ - 2.5. The accuracy of FRAX in identifying osteoporosis was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Among 2991 participants (average age 69.2 ± 6.5 years), the discriminative ability was acceptable for both FRAX hip fracture (HF) (AUC = 0.75) and major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) (AUC = 0.72). A cut-off value of 1.5 for FRAX HF and 4.5 for FRAX MOF demonstrated excellent sensitivity (90.4%) and a high negative predictive value (89.7%) in osteoporosis detection. This study identifies FRAX cut-off values that can effectively screen for high-risk osteoporosis in the Thai geriatric population and suggests that FRAX could be a valuable tool for initial osteoporosis screening in Thai seniors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.