ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
Machine learning-based prediction of post-induction hypotension: identifying risk factors and enhancing anesthesia management.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prediction models for post-induction hypotension in patients undergoing general anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence for Perioperative Risk Prediction in Anesthesiology: A Bibliometric and Knowledge-Mapping Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Obesity and age increase hypoxia risk during esophagogastroduodenoscopy under monitored anesthesia care: risk stratification and evaluation of a procedural oxygen mask.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Article
- Transformer-based deep learning model for real-time prediction of intraoperative hypotension using dynamic time-series vital signs: A retrospective study.PLoS medicine · 2026Article
- Explainable artificial intelligence in anesthesiology prediction models: bridging the gap from black-box algorithms to clinical decision support.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Development and explainability of a machine learning prediction model for histological prostatic inflammation in surgically treated patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a single-center internal validation study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Advancing a Hybrid Decision-Making Model in Anesthesiology: Applications of Artificial Intelligence in the Perioperative Setting.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Identifying patterns of high intraoperative blood pressure variability in noncardiac surgery using explainable machine learning: a retrospective cohort study.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- Incidence and Risk Factors of Orthostatic Hypotension and Postural Tachycardia Following Sedated Colonoscopy: A Prospective Observational Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- [Remimazolam stabilizes hemodynamics during anesthesia induction but fails to reduce renal injury risk following laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical UniversityArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPost-induction hypotension (PIH) increases surgical complications including myocardial injury, acute kidney injury, delirium, stroke, prolonged hospitalization, and endangerment of the patient's life. Machine learning is an effective tool to analyze large amounts of data and identify perioperative complication factors. This study aims to identify risk factors for PIH and develop predictive models to support anesthesia management.
methodsA dataset of 5406 patients was analyzed using machine learning methods. Logistic regression, random forest, XGBoost, and neural network models were compared. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA).
resultsThe logistic regression model achieved an AUROC of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.71-0.77), outperforming the random forest (AUROC: 0.71), XGBoost (AUROC: 0.72), and neural network (AUROC: 0.72) models. In terms of calibration, logistic regression demonstrated superior performance, as reflected by Brier Scores and calibration curves, followed by XGBoost, random forest, and neural network. Decision curve analysis indicated that the logistic regression model provided the greatest clinical utility among all models. Baseline blood pressure, age, sex, type of surgery, platelet count, and certain anesthesia-inducing drugs were identified as important features.
conclusionsThis study provides a valuable tool for personalized preoperative risk assessment and customized anesthesia management, allowing for early intervention and improved patient outcomes. Integration of machine learning models into electronic medical record systems can facilitate real-time risk assessment and prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.