Observational studyBMC medical education2025
Enhancing communication skills in diabetes care: an observational study regarding the impact of role-playing training for medical staff.
Observational study in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEffective communication is crucial for supporting people with diabetes, yet many medical staff feel unsure about their skills in this area. We evaluated role-playing seminars as a method to improve communication skills among medical staff.
methodsFrom 2008 to 2024, we conducted 78 seminars with 2,458 participants, including nurses, dietitians, and pharmacists. Participants engaged in realistic simulated scenarios based on common clinical situations of patient-medical staff interactions, taking on roles as patients (patient performers), medical staff (medical staff performers), and observers. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, some seminars were held online. Participants were asked to answer a questionnaire regarding their background, impressions of playing individual roles, general comments regarding the seminar, changes in their patient interactions, the possibility of conducting this seminar at their facilities, and impressions of online seminars compared with those of in-person seminars.
resultsThe responses of the participants to these seminars were mostly positive. The representative responses indicated that patient performers understood better patients' feelings and medical staff performers had a chance to recognize their insufficient knowledge. The observers also had the chance to learn new communication skills by observing the conversations of other role-players. Compared with in-person seminars, the positive aspects of online seminars were a reduction in time and travel costs and the removal of geographical obstacles. The negative aspects were mostly technology-related concerns.
conclusionTraining seminars using in-person or online role-playing provided medical staff with opportunities and support to improve their communication skills. Further research on measures to improve the communication skills of medical staff and ways to evaluate their efficacy is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.