ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
Painful considerations in exercise-management for rotator cuff related shoulder pain: a scoping review on pain-related prescription parameters.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of exercise therapy for the rehabilitation of rotator cuff-related shoulder pain: a subgroup analysis of racquet sport athletes.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundResistance exercise is recommended as the first line of treatment for rotator cuff related shoulder pain (RCRSP), but with conflicting evidence supporting the superiority of specific prescription parameters. Particularly, the role of pain-related prescription parameters remains poorly understood, despite their wide clinical application and potential impact on treatment outcomes. This review aims to investigate how pain-related prescription parameters, such as pain allowance and intensity limits, are reported, described, and applied in clinical trials assessing resistance exercise interventions for RCRSP.
methodsGuided by PRISMA-ScR, this scoping review followed a comprehensive and systematic search in MEDLINE (Ovid), MEDLINE (EMBASE), Central (Cochrane), PEDro and CINAHL (EBSCO). Two authors independently performed title and abstract screening, and full text screening on eligible records. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published in English between 2018 and 2023, applying resistance exercise for RCRSP were included. Both quantitative and qualitative approaches to data analysis were conducted.
resultsThe literature search identified 7500 records, of which 4588 titles and abstracts were screened after duplicate removal. Altogether, 304 full texts were screened leaving a total of 86 records in the final analysis. Fifty-eight (67%) studies did not mention the use of any pain-related prescription parameters, resulting in data extraction from the 28 remaining studies. Applied parameters were widely heterogenic, but three categories of pain allowance styles were identified and categorized into "yes", "no" or "ambiguous". These categories were commonly guided by specific Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)/Visual Analog Scale (VAS) limits or individual pain tolerance, used for pain monitoring and exercise progression. Citations and/or justifications for the chosen pain-related prescription parameters were reported by 10 (36%) studies, in which 5 main themes for justifications, and 3 key papers for the citations were identified.
conclusionThis review reveals substantial reporting deficiencies regarding pain-related prescription parameters in RCTs addressing RCRSP with resistance exercise. The identified parameters varied widely, reflecting a lack of consensus and evidence-based guidance in the literature and in a clinical setting. To advance our understanding on the role of pain-related prescription parameters, more consistent reporting of these parameters in future research is warranted.
trial registrationPublished on the Open Science Framework 28.02.24: osf.io/a52kn.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.