ArticleBMC plant biology2025
Evolution of morphological traits of Dendrobium sensu lato (Orchidaceae)-an attempt to resolve phylogenetic relationships in nominal and morphologically convergent sections.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anatomical drivers of organ size and trait coordinated association between pseudobulbs and roots in Dendrobium.Botanical studies · 2026Article
- Out of the tropics and adaptation in the Asian subtropics of Dendrobium section Dendrobium (Orchidaceae).Communications biology · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of codon usage bias and phylogenetic relationships in chloroplast genomes across 49 Dendrobium species.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Is Self-Incompatibility Related to Nectar Presence inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDendrobium is a large genus within the Orchidaceae family, containing over 1,600 species. Most are sympodial epiphytes. These species are distributed throughout southern, eastern, and southeastern Asia, the Pacific Islands, Australia, New Guinea, and New Zealand. Infrageneric classification of this group is challenging, largely because of the large number of taxa, the wide geographic range, and the considerable morphological diversity. The primary objective of our research was to analyze the genus Dendrobium (focusing primarily on the nominal section) using DNA sequences and to integrate these findings with morphological data.
resultsUPGMA morphological analysis and SIMPER analysis, considering 14 characters, showed that characters such as the placement of the inflorescence, the pseudobulbs from which the inflorescence grows, the surface of the lip, and the number of lobes on the lip are the distinguishing characters of the taxa within Dendrobium sensu lato.The nominal section, Stachyobium, and Formosae (species-rich) are more morphologically variable and exhibit a wide range of variability, in contrast to sections with fewer species. The reconstruction of the ancestral states of Dendrobium sensu lato showed that most of the characters examined arose independently several times during evolution. The only exception is dorsiventrally compressed leaves, a character that arose only once. In addition, the nominal section is not monophyletic and is not entirely consistent with morphology, and species of Holochrysa, Breviflores and Stuposa are closely related.
conclusionWe conclude that convergent evolution likely occurred among Dendrobium sensu lato representatives, and that many floral traits may have resulted from adaptations to pollinators. This has led to numerous classification problems within the genus. We have not received a clear answer to the question of how to classify species across the genus. Therefore, in this study, we focused primarily on the nominal section.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.