ArticleBMJ open2025
Effect of vestibular rehabilitation treatment (VRT) on patients with unsteadiness after intratympanic gentamicin in Menière's disease: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06143462 (The Effect of Vestibular Rehabilitation Treatment), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effect of Vestibular Rehabilitation Treatment (VRT) on Patients With Unsteadiness After Intratympanic Gentamicin in Meniere's Disease: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMenière's disease (MD) is a multifactorial disease characterised by recurring vertigo, tinnitus and fluctuating sensorineural hearing loss as typical clinical symptoms. For patients with MD with poor response to non-invasive treatments, it is recommended to use intratympanic gentamicin treatment. The destruction of vestibular organs by gentamicin may cause residual vestibular symptoms, notably unsteadiness. However, most previous clinical studies paid little attention to this issue. Currently, vestibular rehabilitation treatment (VRT) has been proven to be an effective method for controlling vestibular symptoms and has been applied to patients with various vestibular diseases. The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of VRT versus usual care in MD patients who experience persistent unsteadiness for 1 month after intratympanic gentamicin treatment, in order to understand whether VRT has a positive impact on balance maintenance and vertigo control in patients with MD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Randomised, assessor-blinded, controlled clinical trials will be used to compare the efficacy of balance function before and after VRT. Patients with MD who experience chronic unsteadiness for 1 month after intratympanic gentamicin treatment will be recruited and receive VRT, mainly including gaze stability training, gait rehabilitation, vestibular habituation training, etc. The outcomes assessments will be conducted at baseline and at eighth week and sixth month post-randomisation. The primary outcome will be the improvements in vestibular function quantified through the Functional Gait Assessment. The secondary outcomes will include sensory organisation test, vestibular laboratory tests (video head impulse test, caloric test and vestibular evoked myogenic potentials), Menière's disease outcomes questionnaire, visual vertigo analogue scale and vestibular activities and participation measure. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This trial received ethical approval from the Institutional Review Board of Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University (reference number 2024020). The study results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journals and conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06143462.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.