ArticleInternational dental journal2025
Causal Association Between Microbiome and Oral-Oropharyngeal Cancer: A Mendelian Randomization Study.
Article in International dental journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomisation Analysis of the Oral Microbiome and Oral/Oropharyngeal/Tongue Cancers.Oral health & preventive dentistry · 2026Article
- Article
- Multi-omics integration and Mendelian randomization reveal the mechanisms and experimental validation of curcumin targeting the RXRA-PI3K/AKT axis to enhance cisplatin sensitivity in gastric cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Unveiling the Relationship Between Oral Microbiota and Alzheimer's Disease: A Genetic Instrumental Variable Analysis via Mendelian Randomization.Brain and behavior · 2025Article
- Integrating GEO Database, Mendelian Randomization, and Molecular Docking to Identify HLA-C as a Potential Therapeutic Target for Periodontitis.Mediators of inflammation · 2025Article
- The impact of sarcopenia on prognosis and fruquintinib efficacy in advanced colorectal cancer: a retrospective and mendelian randomization study.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND
aimsThis study aimed to examine the causal link between oral microbiome and the risk of oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OOPSCC) using Mendelian randomization (MR).
methodsUtilizing single nucleotide polymorphisms as instrumental variables, we applied the MR inverse-variance weighted approach to assess the impact of salivary and tongue microbiome on OOPSCC. The data were obtained from the CNGBdb database and the UK Biobank, and analytical procedures were performed using the R package 'TwoSampleMR'. To ensure the robustness of our findings, we conducted sensitivity studies, which included the MR-Egger intercept test, to establish strong correlations and eliminate the phenomenon of horizontal pleiotropy.
resultOur large-scale MR study revealed a genetically predisposed causal relationship between 13 microbial taxa, each from saliva and tongue, with OOPSCC. Notably, microbial taxa from six genera, including Prevotella, Neisseria, Veillonella, Granulicatella, Treponema, and Streptococcus, in both salivary and tongue microbiomes, showed this relationship. Conversely, several taxa, including Hemophilus, Solobacterium, Campylobacter, and Porphyromonas, predominantly demonstrated an inverse relationship, suggesting a protective effect. The robustness of our findings was further confirmed through sensitivity analyses, providing additional confidence in our results.
conclusionOur MR study indicates that the oral microbiota has a significant causal impact on the risk of oral and oropharyngeal cancers. The microbial biomarkers we identified, which are linked to OOPSCC, have the potential to uncover the underlying mechanisms and pave the way for new therapeutic approaches for targeted treatment of these malignancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.