ArticleClinical lung cancer2025
Association of Sarcopenia With Toxicity and Survival in Patients With Lung Cancer, a Multi-Institutional Study With External Dataset Validation.
Article in Clinical lung cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Towards Rapid Bedside Detection of Sarcopenia in Cancer Patients: The Role of Rectus Femoris Muscle Ultrasonography-A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- The impact of sarcopenia and body mass index on treatment toxicity and survival in patients with extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma: a retrospective analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Multidimensional modeling and stratification of nutritional risk in non-small cell lung cancer based on artificial intelligence-derived CT body composition phenotypes.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Comment on "The association between physical activity levels and quality of life in elderly lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy in China: a cross-sectional study".Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionSarcopenia is associated with worse survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but less studied in association with toxicity. Here, we investigated the association between imaging-assessed sarcopenia with toxicity in patients with NSCLC.
methodsWe analyzed a "chemoradiation" cohort (n = 318) of patients with NSCLC treated with chemoradiation, and an external validation "chemo-surgery" cohort (n = 108) who were treated with chemotherapy and surgery from 2002 to 2013 at a different institution. A deep-learning pipeline utilized pretreatment computed tomography scans to estimate SM area at the third lumbar vertebral level. Sarcopenia was defined by dichotomizing SM index, (SM adjusted for height and sex). Primary endpoint was NCI CTCAE v5.0 grade 3 to 5 (G3-5) toxicity within 21-days of first chemotherapy cycle. Multivariable analyses (MVA) of toxicity endpoints with sarcopenia and baseline characteristics were performed by logistic regression, and overall survival (OS) was analyzed using Cox regression.
resultsSarcopenia was identified in 36% and 36% of patients in the chemoradiation and chemo-surgery cohorts, respectively. On MVA, sarcopenia was associated with worse G3-5 toxicity in chemoradiation (HR 2.00, P < .01) and chemo-surgery cohorts (HR 2.95, P = .02). In the chemoradiation cohort, worse OS was associated with G3-5 toxicity (HR 1.42, P = .02) but not sarcopenia on MVA. In chemo-surgery cohort, worse OS was associated with sarcopenia (HR 2.03, P = .02) but not G3-5 toxicity on MVA.
conclusionSarcopenia, assessed by an automated deep-learning system, was associated with worse toxicity and survival outcomes in patients with NSCLC. Sarcopenia can be utilized to tailor treatment decisions to optimize adverse events and survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.