Trial reportAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2025
Predicting dose response to prostate cancer radiotherapy: validation of a radiation signature in the randomized phase III NRG/RTOG 0126 and SAKK 09/10 trials.
Trial report in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phase II trial of combination radiation, hormone, and immunotherapy in grade group 5 prostate cancer.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Trial
- [European urology · 2026Trial
- [SAKK 09/10: dose-intensified salvage radiotherapy for biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy-no benefit, but additional toxicity?]Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026Article
- Lesion Absorbed Dose-Response Relationship in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Undergoing [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025Article
- Biomarkers in Localized Prostate Cancer: From Diagnosis to Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Optimizing salvage radiotherapy in prostate cancer: the emerging role of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Article
- How to tailor the radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy in the modern era of molecular imaging, genomic testing, and technology development?Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2025Review
- Recurrent prostate adenocarcinoma after radical prostatectomy: Principles of multidisciplinary management across a spectrum of disease.CA: a cancer journal for cliniciansArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
33 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe SAKK 09/10 trial randomized biochemically recurrent prostate cancer patients to salvage radiation 64 Gy versus 70 Gy, and the NRG/RTOG 0126 randomized intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients to definitive radiation 70.2 Gy versus 79.2 Gy. We investigated a previously developed Post-Operative Radiation Therapy Outcomes Score (PORTOS) to identify preferential benefit from radiation dose escalation (DE). MATERIALS AND
methodsPORTOS was evaluated in patients enrolled in SAKK 09/10 and NRG/RTOG 0126 with available tissue that passed quality control (n = 226, 215). PORTOS was evaluated in the published post-operative groups in SAKK 09/10 and in tertiles in NRG/RTOG 0126 as cut-offs had not been established for biopsy samples and definitive radiation patients. Clinical and molecular correlates in a real-world dataset of 42 407 prostatectomy and 31 107 biopsy samples were also analyzed.
resultsIn SAKK 09/10, the biomarker-treatment interaction was statistically significant between PORTOS (lower versus higher) and treatment arm for clinical progression-free survival. Only patients in the higher PORTOS group benefited from DE. In NRG/RTOG 0126, in patients with a lower tertile PORTOS, there was no difference in Phoenix biochemical failure (BF). However, for patients in the average and higher tertile PORTOS range, there was a significant benefit for DE for Phoenix BF. An interaction test indicated a significant difference in benefit for DE between higher and lower PORTOS groups. PORTOS was not strongly associated with clinicopathological variables in either trial or the large real-world dataset. In the latter, PORTOS was modestly associated with hypoxia signatures and strongly associated with immune signatures and subtypes.
conclusionIn the SAKK 09/10 and RTOG 0126 randomized controlled trials, we demonstrated that PORTOS can potentially identify a subset of patients who benefit from DE, a subgroup that cannot be identified using clinicopathological or prognostic variables. These results suggest that PORTOS could be used clinically as a predictor of radiation response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.