Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39986927›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2025

Predicting dose response to prostate cancer radiotherapy: validation of a radiation signature in the randomized phase III NRG/RTOG 0126 and SAKK 09/10 trials.

A Dal Pra, P Ghadjar, H M Ryu, J A Proudfoot, S Hayoz, J M Michalski, D E Spratt, Y Liu, C Schär, A M Berlin and 23 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled TrialValidation Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. [European urology · 2026
    Trial
  3. [SAKK 09/10: dose-intensified salvage radiotherapy for biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy-no benefit, but additional toxicity?]Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Article
  4. Lesion Absorbed Dose-Response Relationship in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Undergoing [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Biomarkers in Localized Prostate Cancer: From Diagnosis to Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. How to tailor the radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy in the modern era of molecular imaging, genomic testing, and technology development?Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors.

A Dal PraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami/Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, USA. Electronic address: alan.dalpra@med.miami.edu.
P GhadjarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
H M RyuVeracyte Inc., San Diego, USA.
J A ProudfootVeracyte Inc., San Diego, USA.
S HayozSAKK Coordinating Center, Bern, Switzerland.
J M MichalskiWashington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, USA.
D E SprattUniversity Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, USA.
Y LiuVeracyte Inc., San Diego, USA.
C SchärSAKK Coordinating Center, Bern, Switzerland.
A M BerlinUniversity Health Network-Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
D R ZwahlenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland.
J P SimkoUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.
T HölscherDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.
J A EfstathiouMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, USA.
B PolatDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
H M SandlerCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA.
G HildebrandtDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
M B ParliamentUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
A-C MuellerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany.
I S DayesJuravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Canada.
L PlasswilmDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
R J M CorreaLondon Health Sciences Centre, London, Canada.
J M RobertsonWilliam Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, USA.
T G KarrisonNRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, USA.
E DavicioniVeracyte Inc., San Diego, USA.
W A HallMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA.
F Y FengUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.
A PollackDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami/Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, USA.
G N ThalmannDepartment of Urology, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
P L NguyenDana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA.
D M AebersoldDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
P T TranDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA. Electronic address: phuoc.tran@som.umaryland.edu.
S G ZhaoDepartment of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA. Electronic address: shgzhao@humonc.wisc.edu.

Funding

NRG Oncology Network Group Operations Center - GY9 BIQSFP Reports/BudgetsU10CA180868 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI NORMAN WOLMARK · 2014 to 2026
$206.8M
Statistics CoreU10CA180822 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI James J. Dignam · 2014 to 2026
$146.4M
NRG Oncology NCORP Research Base-BIQSFPUG1CA189867 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI Deborah Watkins Bruner, Lisa A. Kachnic · 2014 to 2026
$140.5M
NRG Oncology Biospecimen BankU24CA196067 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI Tanner J. Freeman, Nilsa Del Carmen Ramirez Milan · 2015 to 2026
$42.6M
Tumor Biology Research ProgramP30CA240139 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI NIPUN B. MERCHANT · 2019 to 2026
$24.1M
Resource Sharing CoreU54CA273956 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI Luigi Marchionni · 2022 to 2026
$8.9M
Determining the clinical impact of gene expression testing in localized prostate cancerR01CA240991 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MORGAN, TODD M., SPRATT, DANIEL EIDELBERG · 2019 to 2024
$3.1M
Tumor-barcoding coupled with high-throughput sequencing for quantitative radiogenomics of the abscopal response in NSCLCR01CA271540 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Phuoc T. Tran · 2023 to 2026
$2.3M
DYNAMIC MOLECULAR EVOLUTION OF TREATMENT RESISTANT CANCERDP2CA271832 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ZHAO, SHUANG · 2021 to 2024
$2.3M
NCI NIH HHS DP2 CA271832NCI NIH HHS P30 CA240139NCI NIH HHS R01 CA240991NCI NIH HHS R01 CA271540NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180822NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180868NCI NIH HHS U24 CA196067NCI NIH HHS U54 CA273956NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189867
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe SAKK 09/10 trial randomized biochemically recurrent prostate cancer patients to salvage radiation 64 Gy versus 70 Gy, and the NRG/RTOG 0126 randomized intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients to definitive radiation 70.2 Gy versus 79.2 Gy. We investigated a previously developed Post-Operative Radiation Therapy Outcomes Score (PORTOS) to identify preferential benefit from radiation dose escalation (DE). MATERIALS AND

methodsPORTOS was evaluated in patients enrolled in SAKK 09/10 and NRG/RTOG 0126 with available tissue that passed quality control (n = 226, 215). PORTOS was evaluated in the published post-operative groups in SAKK 09/10 and in tertiles in NRG/RTOG 0126 as cut-offs had not been established for biopsy samples and definitive radiation patients. Clinical and molecular correlates in a real-world dataset of 42 407 prostatectomy and 31 107 biopsy samples were also analyzed.

resultsIn SAKK 09/10, the biomarker-treatment interaction was statistically significant between PORTOS (lower versus higher) and treatment arm for clinical progression-free survival. Only patients in the higher PORTOS group benefited from DE. In NRG/RTOG 0126, in patients with a lower tertile PORTOS, there was no difference in Phoenix biochemical failure (BF). However, for patients in the average and higher tertile PORTOS range, there was a significant benefit for DE for Phoenix BF. An interaction test indicated a significant difference in benefit for DE between higher and lower PORTOS groups. PORTOS was not strongly associated with clinicopathological variables in either trial or the large real-world dataset. In the latter, PORTOS was modestly associated with hypoxia signatures and strongly associated with immune signatures and subtypes.

conclusionIn the SAKK 09/10 and RTOG 0126 randomized controlled trials, we demonstrated that PORTOS can potentially identify a subset of patients who benefit from DE, a subgroup that cannot be identified using clinicopathological or prognostic variables. These results suggest that PORTOS could be used clinically as a predictor of radiation response.

Indexed as

Neoplasm Recurrence, LocalProstatic NeoplasmsAgedDose-Response Relationship, RadiationHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProstatectomyRadiotherapy DosageSalvage Therapybiomarkersprostate cancerradiation dose response

Identifiers

PMID39986927
PMCPMC12034480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.