Observational studyThe Lancet. Planetary health2025
Environmental and patient safety outcomes of a health-system Green Anesthesia Initiative (GAIA): a retrospective observational cohort study.
Observational study in The Lancet. Planetary health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comments on: Environmental and clinical rationale for the use of desflurane: a review of the literature.Journal of anesthesia · 2026Article
- Green transplant: A scoping review of sustainability challenges and opportunities in transplantation.World journal of transplantation · 2026Review
- Environmental considerations in human genomic data governance: overcoming normative challenges.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- Results and Future Perspectives of the Sustainable Anesthesia Project: A Large-Scale, Real-World Implementation Study at the Largest Spanish Private Healthcare Provider.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInhaled anaesthetics are greenhouse gases. However, changes in the delivery of inhaled anaesthetics can mitigate environmental impact. We hypothesised that system-wide changes to the delivery of anaesthesia care would reduce environmental harm without compromising patient outcomes.
methodsWe launched the Green Anesthesia Initiative (GAIA) in March, 2022, with the aims of reducing the use of nitrous oxide, using less environmentally harmful inhaled fluorinated ethers, and increasing intravenous anaesthetic use. In this retrospective cohort study, we used electronic health record data from general anaesthetics performed on all patients older than 1 year between March 1, 2021, and Feb 28, 2023, at a single US academic medical centre across multiple sites, collecting data from before and after the introduction of GAIA. Patients with missing or invalid data recorded by the anaesthesia machine, patients given general anaesthetics for electroconvulsive therapy, and patients who met American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification 6 were excluded. Using multivariable modelling, we compared estimated CO
findingsWe recorded 45 692 patients pre-intervention (23 193 [50·8%] female, 22 494 [49·2%] male, five [<0·1%] unknown) and 47 199 post-intervention (23 981 [50·8%] female, 23 209 [49·2%] male, nine [<0·1%] unknown). After the implementation of GAIA, CO
interpretationA health-system wide intervention reduces greenhouse gas emissions attributable to anaesthesia care without detriment to patient outcomes.
fundingUniversity of Michigan Medical School and National Institutes of Health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.