Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39986278›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2025

Genetic association studies using disease liabilities from deep neural networks.

Lu Yang, Marie C Sadler, Russ B Altman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of human genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lu YangDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. Electronic address: luy@stanford.edu.
Marie C SadlerDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; University Center for Primary Care and Public Health, 1010 Lausanne, Switzerland; Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Russ B AltmanDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.

Funding

Computational methods for characterizing sources of variability in drug responseR35GM153195 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI RUSS BIAGIO ALTMAN · 2024 to 2026
$1.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM153195
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The case-control study is a widely used method for investigating the genetic underpinnings of binary traits. However, long-term, prospective cohort studies often grapple with absent or evolving health-related outcomes. Here, we propose two methods, liability and meta, for conducting genome-wide association studies (GWASs) that leverage disease liabilities calculated from deep patient phenotyping. Analyzing 38 common traits in ∼300,000 UK Biobank participants, we identified an increased number of loci in comparison to the number identified by the conventional case-control approach, and there were high replication rates in larger external GWASs. Further analyses confirmed the disease specificity of the genetic architecture; the meta method demonstrated higher robustness when phenotypes were imputed with low accuracy. Additionally, polygenic risk scores based on disease liabilities more effectively predicted newly diagnosed cases in the 2022 dataset, which were controls in the earlier 2019 dataset. Our findings demonstrate that integrating high-dimensional phenotypic data into deep neural networks enhances genetic association studies while capturing disease-relevant genetic architecture.

Indexed as

Genetic Association StudiesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenome-Wide Association StudyNeural Networks, ComputerCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMultifactorial InheritancePhenotypePolymorphism, Single Nucleotidecomplex traitsdeep learningdeep neural networksdisease liabilitygenetic associationGWASmachine learningphenotype imputationpolygenic risk scoresUK Biobank

Identifiers

PMID39986278
PMCPMC11948217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.