ArticleWomen's health (London, England)
Knowledge and practices of emergency contraception use and associated factors among female undergraduate students in Northern Uganda: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Women's health (London, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reproductive Health Knowledge, Contraceptive Practices and Predictors of Unprotected Sexual Intercourse among Female Undergraduates in Ogbomoso, Nigeria.Rwanda journal of medicine and health sciences · 2026Article
- Knowledge and attitudes towards contraception among undergraduate students: a multicentre, cross-sectional study in Vietnam.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Awareness and use of emergency contraception among women attending antenatal clinic in a tertiary hospital in Nigeria.Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association · 2025Article
- Advancing sexual and reproductive health and rights in Africa.Women's health (London, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEmergency contraception (EC) can prevent up to 95% of unplanned pregnancies if used correctly. Despite efforts to enhance its accessibility, cost and cultural stigmas persist as formidable barriers.
objectiveThis study assessed the knowledge and practices of EC use and determined the associated factors among the female undergraduate students of Northern Uganda.
designThis was a descriptive, institutional-based cross-sectional study conducted among the female undergraduate students of Lira University in Northern Uganda.
methodsData were collected from 328 female undergraduates who were surveyed using self-administered questionnaires after obtaining informed consent from them. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) and presented as frequencies and percentages, and binary and multiple logistic regressions were used to determine the association between the outcome variable and the independent variables. Results were presented as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals, and associations were considered statistically significant at
resultsThe response proportion was 328/334 (98%). Majority of the participants were 18-23 years old (233/328; 71.0%), had a consistent sexual partner (221/328; 67.4%), and unmarried (206/328; 62.8%). Almost all the participants (315/328; 96%) had heard about EC, where 150/328 (45.7%) learned about EC from health professionals and 135/328 (41.2%) learned about EC from family members and friends. The most well-known brand of EC was Postinor-2 (Levonorgestrel), as reported by 130/328(39.6%) participants. Of the study participants, 200/328 (61.0%) were knowledgeable about the correct timing of EC. Regarding practices of EC use, 214/328 (65.2%) used EC, of whom 122/214 (57.0%) acquired EC from the pharmacy, and most of the participants who had used EC used Postinor-2 (92/214; 43.0%). Of those who used EC, 175/214 (81.8%) used it to prevent unplanned pregnancy, and 182/214 (85.0%) participants used it with the correct timing. The factors that were associated with EC use were being a student who was studying at the Faculty of Health Sciences (adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 4.27, CI: 1.61, 10.09,
conclusionParticipants showed good EC knowledge and usage, but gaps persist. Factors like being a student who was studying at the Faculty of Health Sciences, and lack of a consistent current sexual partner correlated with EC use. Consistent education efforts are needed to address knowledge gaps, focusing on diverse EC forms, reliable information, and affordability. REGISTRATION: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.