Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39985745›Full record

ReviewAnnals of intensive care2025

Thrombocytopenia in the intensive care unit: diagnosis and management.

Frédéric Pène, Lene Russell, Cécile Aubron

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of intensive care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Redefining neonatal thrombocytopenia: an evidence-based approach, improved by the refineR algorithm.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Frédéric PèneService de Médecine Intensive - Réanimation, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris. Centre, Université Paris Cité, 27 rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, 75014, Paris, France. frederic.pene@aphp.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3639-3849
Lene RussellDepartment of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital Gentofte, Hellerup, Denmark.
Cécile AubronService de Médecine Intensive - Réanimation, CHU de Brest, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis narrative review aims to describe the epidemiology and aetiologies of thrombocytopenia in critically ill patients, the bleeding risk assessment in thrombocytopenic patients, and provide an update on platelet transfusion indications.

resultsThrombocytopenia is a common disorder in critically ill patients. The classic definition relies on an absolute platelet count below 150 × 10

conclusionThrombocytopenia in critically ill patients is very frequent with various etiologies, and is associated with worsened prognosis, with or without bleeding complications. Interventional trials focused on critically ill patients are eagerly needed to better delineate the benefits and harms of platelet transfusions.

Identifiers

PMID39985745
PMCPMC11846794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.