Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39985649›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2025

Contrast-enhanced photon-counting detector CT for discriminating local recurrence from postoperative changes after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Zlatan Alagic, Carlos Valls Duran, Anders Svensson-Marcial, Seppo K Koskinen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology experimental, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zlatan AlagicDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden. zlatan.alagic@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7243-8170
Carlos Valls DuranDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden.
Anders Svensson-MarcialDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden.
Seppo K KoskinenDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe evaluated the diagnostic capability of photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) spectral variables in late arterial phase (LAP) and portal venous phase (PVP) to discriminate between local tumor recurrence (LTR) and postoperative changes (POC) after pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) resection.

methodsSeventy-three consecutive PCD-CT scans in 73 patients with postoperative soft-tissue lesions (PSLs) were included, 42 with POC and 31 with LTR. Regions of interest were drawn in each PSL, and spectral variables were calculated: iodine concentration (IC), normalized IC (NIC), fat fraction, attenuation at 40, 70, and 90 keV, and slope of the spectral curve between 40-90 keV. Multivariable binary logistic regression models were constructed. Diagnostic performance was assessed for LAP and PVP using receiver operating characteristic analysis.

resultsIn LAP, all variables except fat fraction showed significant differences between LTR and POC (p ≤ 0.025). In PVP, all variables except NIC and fat fraction demonstrated significant differences between LTR and POC (p ≤ 0.005). Logistic regression analysis included NIC and 70 keV in the LAP-based model and IC and 90 keV in the PVP-based model. Both models achieved a higher area under the curve (AUC) than individual spectral variables in each phase. The LAP-based model achieved an AUC of 0.919 with 94% sensitivity, 84% specificity, and 87% accuracy, while the PVP-based model reached 0.820, 71%, 88%, and 81%, respectively.

conclusionSpectral variables from PCD-CT help distinguish between LTR and POC in LAP and PVP post-PDAC resection. Multivariable logistic regression improves diagnostic performance, especially in LAP. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Measuring normalized iodine concentration and attenuation at 70 keV in late arterial phase, or iodine concentration and attenuation at 90 keV in portal venous phase, and incorporating these values into a logistic regression model can help differentiate between local tumor recurrence and postoperative changes after pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma resection. KEY POINTS: Distinguishing recurrence from postoperative changes on CT after pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma resection is challenging. PCD-CT spectral variable values differed significantly between local tumor recurrence (LTR) and postoperative changes (POC). Logistic regression of spectral variables can help distinguish LTR from POC. The late arterial phase-based model reached an AUC of 0.919 with 94% sensitivity and 84% specificity.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalContrast MediaNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPancreatic NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhotonsPostoperative PeriodRetrospective StudiesContrast MediaCarcinoma (pancreatic ductal)Logistic modelsNeoplasm recurrence (local)Sensitivity and specificityTomography (x-ray computed)

Identifiers

PMID39985649
PMCPMC11846822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.