ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025
Incidence of engraftment syndrome with and without budesonide prophylaxis in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing autologous stem cell transplant.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeEngraftment syndrome (ES), a rare post-transplant complication, has been defined differently across the literature. This study aims to determine if budesonide prophylaxis reduces ES after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) for patients with multiple myeloma (MM), as defined by the published Spitzer or Maiolino criteria or by the ES definition used by Dhakal et al.
methodsA single-center retrospective review was conducted on adult patients who received auto-HCT for MM between January 2017 and October 2023. Patients were divided into those who did not receive budesonide prophylaxis (n = 169) versus those who did (n = 144). The primary endpoint was an incidence of ES by the definition used by Spitzer, Maiolino, and Dhakal et al., respectively. Secondary endpoints included receipt of steroids to treat ES, hospital length of stay, engraftment, and 30- and 100-day mortality rates. Exploratory endpoints were antibiotics started in the peri-engraftment period and number of anti-diarrheal and anti-emetic doses.
resultsNo difference existed between groups in the primary outcome by the ES definition used by Spitzer, Maiolino, or Dhakal et al. (all p > 0.05). Further, no difference existed with respect to any secondary outcomes (all p > 0.05) except a lower incidence of receipt of antibiotics in the peri-engraftment period for those who received budesonide.
conclusionOur findings suggest concordance between Spitzer and Maiolino criteria with clinically documented ES, with higher incidences when the ES definition used by Dhakal et al. is utilized. Larger controlled trials need to be performed to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39985640What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.