SynthesisEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2025
Predictive utility of the machine learning algorithms in predicting tendinopathy: a meta-analysis of diagnostic test studies.
Synthesis in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTendinopathy, a degenerative condition of tendon collagen protein, is a common sports injury among elite athletes. Despite its prevalence, the manifestation and progression of tendinopathy remain unclear, and the efficiency of diagnosis and treatment modalities is uncertain. Artificial intelligence and machine learning (ML) have shown positive results in disease diagnosis and treatment evaluation. This systematic review examined many ML methods and their diagnostic yield in predicting tendinopathy.
methodsA comprehensive search of electronic databases, including Ovid Medline, EMBASE, PubMed and the Web of Science, was conducted. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The statistical analysis was performed using mada package on R software.
resultsFour studies were considered eligible for this meta-analysis, constituting outcomes from 12,611 patients. The ML methods used in the selected studies included random forest, convolutional neural networks and linear support vector machines. The results showed that all selected studies demonstrated the relevance of ML in moderately (Reviewer 2, Comment 2) predicting tendinopathy. The pooled diagnostic yield of the ML algorithms estimated an overall sensitivity of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.64 to 0.82, p = < 0.001) and an overall specificity of 0.69 (95% CI: 0.49 to 0.85, p = 0.06). The diagnostic odds ratio was 6.01 (95% CI: 1.8 to 20.13), with substantial heterogeneity (I
conclusionML methods can predict tendinopathy accurately in elite and non-elite athletes. However, further research is needed to establish the specific clinical features associated with tendinopathy prevalence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39985636What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.