Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39985636›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2025

Predictive utility of the machine learning algorithms in predicting tendinopathy: a meta-analysis of diagnostic test studies.

Duncan Muir, Ahmed Elgebaly, Woo Jae Kim, Ahmad Althaher, Ali Narvani, Mohamed A Imam

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Duncan MuirRoyal Berkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Reading, UK. duncan.muir@nhs.net.
Ahmed ElgebalySmart Health Centre, University of East London, London, UK.
Woo Jae KimSurrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, Redhill, UK.
Ahmad AlthaherSmart Health Centre, University of East London, London, UK.
Ali NarvaniAshford and St Peter's Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust , Chertsey, UK.
Mohamed A ImamSmart Health Centre, University of East London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTendinopathy, a degenerative condition of tendon collagen protein, is a common sports injury among elite athletes. Despite its prevalence, the manifestation and progression of tendinopathy remain unclear, and the efficiency of diagnosis and treatment modalities is uncertain. Artificial intelligence and machine learning (ML) have shown positive results in disease diagnosis and treatment evaluation. This systematic review examined many ML methods and their diagnostic yield in predicting tendinopathy.

methodsA comprehensive search of electronic databases, including Ovid Medline, EMBASE, PubMed and the Web of Science, was conducted. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The statistical analysis was performed using mada package on R software.

resultsFour studies were considered eligible for this meta-analysis, constituting outcomes from 12,611 patients. The ML methods used in the selected studies included random forest, convolutional neural networks and linear support vector machines. The results showed that all selected studies demonstrated the relevance of ML in moderately (Reviewer 2, Comment 2) predicting tendinopathy. The pooled diagnostic yield of the ML algorithms estimated an overall sensitivity of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.64 to 0.82, p =  < 0.001) and an overall specificity of 0.69 (95% CI: 0.49 to 0.85, p = 0.06). The diagnostic odds ratio was 6.01 (95% CI: 1.8 to 20.13), with substantial heterogeneity (I

conclusionML methods can predict tendinopathy accurately in elite and non-elite athletes. However, further research is needed to establish the specific clinical features associated with tendinopathy prevalence.

Indexed as

Athletic InjuriesMachine LearningTendinopathyAlgorithmsHumansPredictive Value of TestsSensitivity and SpecificityDiagnosisMachine learningPredictionTendinopathy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.