Observational studyJournal of anesthesia2025
The impact of the pore position of a self-coiling catheter for continuous interscalene brachial plexus block on postoperative pain in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery: a prospective observational study.
Observational study in Journal of anesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This prospective observational study aimed to investigate the usefulness of the self-coiling catheter for continuous interscalene brachial plexus block (CISB) in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). In 22 patients, the self-coiling tip of catheter was placed anterior to the C5 and C6 roots under ultrasound guidance. The primary outcome is the relationship between the distance from the distal side pore of the catheter to the C5/C6 nerve roots and the visual analogue scale (VAS) of postoperative pain. The distance was recorded as a positive value when the distal pore was anterior to the C5/C6 nerve roots, and as a negative value when it was posterior to the roots. The median distance from the distal pore to C5/C6 nerve roots was 5.0 [4.1, 6.5] mm at catheter placement before surgery and 0.0 [- 4.3, 2.2] mm at catheter removal the day after surgery. The distance between the distal pore and the cervical nerve roots was associated with the VAS score at catheter removal (r =- 0.455, P = 0.033). These findings suggest that the distance between the distal pore of the self-coiling catheter and the C5/C6 nerve roots may affect the analgesic effect of CISB after ARCR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39985569What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.