ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2025
Analysis of the TiO
Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Structural and Electronic Reconstruction of Extended Defects in Pnictogen Chalcohalides.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2026Article
- A Simple Microplate Assay for Accelerated Photocatalytic Activity Evaluation.ACS environmental Au · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Photoelectrochemical water splitting offers a promising pathway for green hydrogen production, but its efficiency is limited by electron-hole recombination. Overcoming this challenge requires detailed analysis of the relationship between charge separation and charge transfer kinetics under operando conditions. Here, we applied intensity-modulated photocurrent spectroscopy (IMPS) combined with distribution of relaxation times (DRT) analysis to the photoanodic process under varying light intensities. This approach revealed three distinct applied potential regions: a high-potential region with constant admittance independent of light intensity; a midpotential region strongly influenced by light intensity; and a low-potential region with back electron-hole recombination (BER). Crucially, our analysis demonstrated that what has traditionally been viewed as a single bulk recombination process can be resolved into distinct mechanisms based on light intensity dependence. Additionally, we identified satellite peaks in the slow kinetic regions for the first time. These peaks, influenced by light intensity and reaction conditions, revealed novel insights into surface-trapped hole dynamics. Based on these insights, we propose tailored band bending models for each kinetic scenario and discuss the implications of satellite peaks for reaction bottlenecks. These results offer new perspectives on understanding and optimizing photoelectrochemical systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.