Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39985411›Full record

SynthesisJournal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.]2025

Color Match of Single-Shade Versus Multi-Shade Resin Composites: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.

Eleonora Forabosco, Uros Josic, Ugo Consolo, Luigi Generali, Carlo D'Alessandro, Lorenzo Breschi, Vittorio Checchi

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.], 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eleonora ForaboscoDepartment of Surgery, Medicine, Dentistry and Morphological Sciences With Transplant Surgery, Oncology and Regenerative Medicine Relevance, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5464-837X
Uros JosicDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Ugo ConsoloDepartment of Surgery, Medicine, Dentistry and Morphological Sciences With Transplant Surgery, Oncology and Regenerative Medicine Relevance, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Luigi GeneraliDepartment of Surgery, Medicine, Dentistry and Morphological Sciences With Transplant Surgery, Oncology and Regenerative Medicine Relevance, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3764-7046
Carlo D'AlessandroDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Lorenzo BreschiDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7621-226X
Vittorio ChecchiDepartment of Surgery, Medicine, Dentistry and Morphological Sciences With Transplant Surgery, Oncology and Regenerative Medicine Relevance, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3053-5562

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo address the following PICOS question: Can single-shade resin composites achieve a color match comparable to multi-shade composites in tooth restoration? MATERIALS AND

methodsA comprehensive search was conducted across multiple electronic databases to identify in vitro and clinical studies evaluating the color match in tooth restoration, in terms of CIELAB (ΔE

resultsAfter initial screening, 15 in vitro studies and 4 RCTs met the inclusion criteria for qualitative synthesis, with 8 in vitro studies selected for quantitative analysis. The majority of in vitro studies were classified as medium risk of bias, while RCTs were ranked as low risk of bias. Meta-analyses performed on in vitro studies revealed that single-shade composites exhibited statistically significant higher color differences with the surrounding tooth structure compared to multi-shade composites, for both ΔE

conclusionsThis systematic review concluded that multi-shade composites provide a more accurate color match between tooth and direct restoration than single-shade materials when evaluated by instrumental analysis in laboratory settings. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Multi-shade composites exhibit superior color match properties in laboratory studies. However, single-shade composites are a promising alternative when observed visually in clinical settings.

Indexed as

Composite ResinsDental Restoration, PermanentColorHumansComposite Resinscolor matchdirect restorationmeta‐analysismulti‐shaderesin compositesingle‐shadesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39985411
PMCPMC12087942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.