Observational studyAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025
The Antiviral Efficacy and Safety of Azvudine in Hospitalized SARS-CoV-2 Infected Patients with Liver Diseases Based on a Multicenter, Retrospective Cohort Study.
Observational study in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06349655 (Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Oral Azvudine in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Oral Azvudine in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19: A Multicenter, Retrospective, Cohort Study
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating the effectiveness and safety of Azvudine for hospitalised patients with COVID-19 and hypertension: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The Antiviral Efficacy and Safety of Azvudine in Hospitalized SARS-CoV-2 Infected Patients with Liver Diseases Based on a Multicenter, Retrospective Cohort Study.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite azvudine being prioritized for the treatment of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, its effectiveness and safety remain inadequately substantiated in hospitalized SARS-CoV-2 infected patients with liver diseases. A retrospective nine-center cohort study along with an independent validation cohort is conducted to examine the efficacy of azvudine (Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT06349655). The primary outcome is all-cause mortality and the secondary outcome is composite disease progression. Efficacy is assessed via Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression, with subgroup and sensitivity analyses for further validation. Among 32 864 hospitalized SARS-CoV-2 infected patients, 1022 eligible azvudine recipients, and 1022 controls are included through propensity score match. Kaplan-Meier analysis reveals that azvudine treatment is associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality and composite disease progression (both p<0.0001). Cox regression analysis suggests azvudine recipients could have a 39% lower risk of all-cause mortality than controls (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.468-0.795, p<0.001), but with no notable significance in composite disease progression (hazard ratio: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.686-1.061, p = 0.154). Subgroup analysis suggests that azvudine has a greater benefit for both all-cause mortality and composite disease progression in patients with kidney diseases or without autoimmune diseases. Three sensitivity analyses and validation cohorts confirm the robustness of the findings. Safety analysis observes few adverse events in azvudine recipients. Within 15 days after azvudine administration, no significant difference in liver function indexes and kidney function indexes is observed between the two groups except for a few time points. These findings demonstrate that azvudine shows potential clinical efficacy in improving all-cause mortality in hospitalized SARS-CoV-2 infected patients with liver diseases, with acceptable adverse effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.