ArticleHealth services research2025
Recruitment and Retention of Rural Health Professionals in Minnesota.
Article in Health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo qualitatively explore the reasons health professionals decide to practice in rural areas. STUDY SETTING AND
designExploratory, cross-sectional, semi-structured qualitative interview and focus group study using thematic analysis with a convenience sample of health professionals in rural Minnesota. Interviews and focus groups were conducted virtually and in person, respectively, between August 2023 and March 2024. DATA SOURCES AND ANALYTIC SAMPLE: Primary interview and focus group data were collected from 19 individual interviews and 3 focus groups (n = 16) with health professionals in rural Minnesota. Interview and focus group recordings were transcribed, deductively coded, and analyzed using constant comparison. PRINCIPAL
findingsRural health professionals cited autonomy and breadth of practice and patient connection as rewarding and challenging components of practice that were distinctly rural. Barriers to recruitment and retention of rural health professionals included lack of housing (especially rental and short-term) and accessible childcare. Potentially promising considerations when recruiting and retaining health professionals include loan forgiveness programs, the appeal of increasing racial and ethnic diversity in rural areas, and the ease of community health advocacy efforts.
conclusionOur findings suggest that to recruit and retain rural health professionals, stakeholders could highlight autonomy and patient connection, reduce childcare and housing barriers, and explore community strengths such as racial/ethnic diversity and opportunities for advocacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.