Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39985303›Full record

ArticleFASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology2025

Postbiotic potential of Lactococcus lactis CNCM I-5388 in alleviating visceral pain in female rat through GABA production: The innovative concept of the "active-GAD bag".

Pedro Gomes, Valérie Laroute, Catherine Beaufrand, Valérie Bézirard, Nathalie Aubry, Chloé Liebgott, Jonna E B Koper, Elyse Parent, Nabil Bosco, Nathalie Ballet and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Pedro GomesToulouse Biotechnology Institute (TBI), Université de Toulouse, CNRS, INRAE, INSA, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9508-2609
Valérie LarouteToulouse Biotechnology Institute (TBI), Université de Toulouse, CNRS, INRAE, INSA, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1108-7714
Catherine BeaufrandToxalim (Research Centre in Food Toxicology), Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, INP-Purpan, UPS, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1906-3699
Valérie BézirardToxalim (Research Centre in Food Toxicology), Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, INP-Purpan, UPS, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3516-8021
Nathalie AubryToulouse Biotechnology Institute (TBI), Université de Toulouse, CNRS, INRAE, INSA, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5722-0253
Chloé LiebgottToxalim (Research Centre in Food Toxicology), Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, INP-Purpan, UPS, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2142-8561
Jonna E B KoperLesaffre Institute of Science and Technology, Lesaffre International, Marcq-en-Barœul, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1929-6791
Elyse ParentLesaffre Institute of Science and Technology, Lesaffre International, Marcq-en-Barœul, France.
Nabil BoscoLesaffre Institute of Science and Technology, Lesaffre International, Marcq-en-Barœul, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3887-7049
Nathalie BalletLesaffre Institute of Science and Technology, Lesaffre International, Marcq-en-Barœul, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6474-7678
Sophie Legrain-RaspaudLesaffre Institute of Science and Technology, Lesaffre International, Marcq-en-Barœul, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7747-5766
Marie-Line Daveran-MingotToulouse Biotechnology Institute (TBI), Université de Toulouse, CNRS, INRAE, INSA, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6884-1840
Vassilia TheodorouToxalim (Research Centre in Food Toxicology), Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, INP-Purpan, UPS, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0801-264X
Muriel Cocaign-BousquetToulouse Biotechnology Institute (TBI), Université de Toulouse, CNRS, INRAE, INSA, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2033-9901
Hélène EutameneToxalim (Research Centre in Food Toxicology), Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, INP-Purpan, UPS, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2983-1938
Muriel Mercier-BoninToxalim (Research Centre in Food Toxicology), Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, INP-Purpan, UPS, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8398-2529

Funding

Lesaffre International CT010082Lesaffre International CT011953
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a multifactorial disorder of the gut-brain axis, characterized by visceral hypersensitivity (VH). Psychobiotics, through GABA synthesis, are good candidates to alleviate gastrointestinal discomfort. Here, we analyzed the GABA-producer Lactococcus lactis CNCM I-5388 as an active-enzyme postbiotic to relieve VH mediated by psychological stress. L. lactis CNCM I-5388 was inactivated by ethanol while maintaining its glutamate decarboxylase (GAD) activity. This EtOH-treated nonviable form was given daily orally for 1, 5, or 10 days to female Wistar rats in comparison with viable L. lactis CNCM I-5388 or vehicle. Visceral sensitivity was measured by electromyography before and after partial restraint stress (PRS). GABA was quantified in the stomach collected from rats and in the gastric compartment of TIM-1 human gut model in fed state. A daily treatment for 5 and 10 days by L. lactis CNCM I-5388 both in its viable and nonviable forms counteracted VH promoted by PRS. However, only viable L. lactis CNCM I-5388 tended to reduce VH after a single administration. After 5-day treatment, only under PRS conditions, the production of GABA within the stomach was enhanced in rats treated with viable or nonviable L. lactis CNCM I-5388. This increase was confirmed by using the TIM-1 human gut model. We found that a postbiotic with an active-GAD enzyme of L. lactis CNCM I-5388, similarly to its viable psychobiotic form, exerts anti-VH properties in an IBS-like rat model. These effects are associated with GABA production in the stomach where the low pH promotes GAD activity.

Indexed as

gamma-Aminobutyric AcidGlutamate DecarboxylaseIrritable Bowel SyndromeLactococcus lactisProbioticsVisceral PainAnimalsFemaleHumansRatsRats, WistarStress, Psychologicalgamma-Aminobutyric AcidGlutamate Decarboxylasegamma (γ)‐amino butyric acidintestinal bowel syndromepostbioticvisceral hypersensitivity

Identifiers

PMID39985303
PMCPMC11846017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.