ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025
Machine Learning Techniques for Simulating Human Psychophysical Testing of Low-Resolution Phosphene Face Images in Artificial Vision.
Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine Learning Techniques for Simulating Human Psychophysical Testing of Low-Resolution Phosphene Face Images in Artificial Vision.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To evaluate the quality of artificial visual percepts generated by emerging methodologies, researchers often rely on labor-intensive and tedious human psychophysical experiments. These experiments necessitate repeated iterations upon any major/minor modifications in the hardware/software configurations. Here, the capacity of standard machine learning (ML) models is investigated to accurately replicate quaternary match-to-sample tasks using low-resolution facial images represented by arrays of phosphenes as input stimuli. Initially, the performance of the ML models trained to approximate innate human facial recognition abilities across a dataset comprising 3600 phosphene images of human faces is analyzed. Subsequently, due to the time constraints and the potential for subject fatigue, the psychophysical test is limited to presenting only 720 low-resolution phosphene images to 36 human subjects. Notably, the superior model adeptly mirrors the behavioral trend of human subjects, offering precise predictions for 8 out of 9 phosphene quality levels on the overlapping test queries. Subsequently, human recognition performances for untested phosphene images are predicted, streamlining the process and minimizing the need for additional psychophysical tests. The findings underscore the transformative potential of ML in reshaping the research paradigm of visual prosthetics, facilitating the expedited advancement of prostheses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.