ArticleExperimental physiology2025
A method for dyadic cardiac rhythmicity analysis: Preliminary evidence on bilateral interactions in fetal-maternal cardiac dynamics.
Article in Experimental physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Higher body-mass index modifies time-resolved maternal autonomic cardiac-uterine coupling during the first stage of human labour.Experimental physiology · 2026Article
- The maternal-fetal communicatome: a scoping review and network physiology perspective on a unified, adaptive, and multiscale interaction network.Frontiers in network physiology · 2026Review
- A developmental framework of interpersonal neural synchrony.Developmental review : DR · 2025Article
- Cardiac-vagal rhythm echoes on the heartbeat's mechanosensory imprint in the brain.Communications biology · 2025Article
- A method for dyadic cardiac rhythmicity analysis: Preliminary evidence on bilateral interactions in fetal-maternal cardiac dynamics.Experimental physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiac activity responds dynamically to metabolic demands and neural regulation. However, little is known about this process during pregnancy. Reports show occasional fetal-maternal heart rate couplings, but it has remained unclear whether these couplings extend to more complex oscillatory patterns of the heart rhythm. We developed a framework of time-varying measures of heart rate and rhythm, to test the presence of co-varying patterns in concurrent maternal and fetal measures (late pregnancy dataset, n = 10, and labour dataset, n = 12). These measures were derived from first and second-order Poincaré plots, with the aim to describe changes in short- and long-term rhythmicity, but also the dynamic shifts in acceleration and deceleration of heart rate. We found episodes of maternal-fetal co-varying patterns of cardiac rhythm in all the measures explored, in both datasets (at least 90% of the dataset presented a significant maternal-fetal correlation in each measure, with P < 0.001), with dynamic delays suggesting bilateral interactions at different time scales. We also found that these couplings intensify during labour (test between late pregnancy vs. labour datasets, P < 0.0015 in all second-order Poincaré plot-derived measures). While most literature suggests that the fetal heart responds to maternal breathing patterns or contractions, we propose the possibility that the fetal heart may also have a signalling function in the context of co-regulatory mechanisms and maternal inter-organ interactions. Understanding these complex visceral oscillations in utero may enhance the assessment of a healthy fetal development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.