ArticleJournal of medical case reports2025
Multiple evanescent white dot syndrome masquerading as atypical optic neuritis: a case report.
Article in Journal of medical case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMultiple evanescent white dot syndrome is a rare posterior uveitis that presents with transient white dots in the retina, which may not always be visible at the time of diagnosis. The disease can mimic atypical optic neuritis owing to overlapping symptoms such as central visual field defect, relative afferent pupillary defect, and optic disc swelling. Here, we report a case of multiple evanescent white dot syndrome masquerading as atypical optic neuritis in a young female patient. CASE PRESENTATION: A 23-year-old female patient of Korean ethnicity presented with ocular pain and visual field defect in her left eye for 1 week. Her best corrected visual acuity was 20/20 in her right eye and 20/30 in her left eye. Pupillary size was 3 mm for both eyes. Relative afferent pupillary defect was detected in the left eye. The color vision test was normal for both eyes. A visual field test revealed blind spot enlargement in the left eye. On fundus examination, disc swelling was found in the left eye. Other abnormalities were not found. The patient was suspected of having atypical optic neuritis. Fluorescein angiography showed hyperfluorescent spots in the posterior pole and leakage from the disc in the left eye. Orbital magnetic resonance imaging did not show any abnormal findings or enhancement. A multifocal electroretinogram showed reduced amplitude for the involved area. There were relatively hyperautofluorescent lesions outside the fovea and hypoautofluorescent fovea on the blue-light fundus autofluorescence image. En face optical coherence tomography revealed multiple hyporeflective dots at the ellipsoid zone. Swept-source optical coherence tomography showed irregular cells in the ellipsoid zone with increased outer retinal thickness. On repeated fundus examination, multiple white dots were found (vaguely). The patient was diagnosed with multiple evanescent white dot syndrome and was able to recover in 6 weeks.
conclusionPatients with multiple evanescent white dot syndrome who present with disc swelling, ocular pain, and relative afferent pupillary defect might be misdiagnosed as having optic neuritis. In atypical optic neuritis, en face optical coherence tomography, blue-light fundus autofluorescence, and swept-source optical coherence tomography can aid in the differential diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.