ArticleReproductive health2025
Contraceptive decision-making and its association with contraceptive use among married adolescent girls in Niger.
Article in Reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveNiger has among the highest rates of child marriage and lowest rates of modern contraceptive use in the world. This study analyzes the association between contraceptive decision-making and contraceptive use among married adolescent girls in rural Niger, including multiple assessments of decision-making and consideration of overt vs. covert contraceptive use.
methodsWe analyzed cross-sectional survey data collected from married adolescent females (n = 823) participating in the third round of data collection (October-November 2019) for the cluster-randomized controlled trial of a family planning intervention study. Contraceptive decision-making measures assessed participants' (a) participation in contraceptive decision-making, (b) final say in decision-making in case of spousal disagreement, and (c) satisfaction with participation in decision-making. Outcomes include contraceptive use ever categorized based on whether use was overt (with husband's knowledge) or covert (without husband's knowledge). Adjusted multinomial logistic regression models were used to test the associations between each decision-making item and each type of contraceptive use.
resultsOver half of participants reported ever using a contraceptive (59%) and that their husbands were the sole decision-makers regarding contraceptive use (60%). Adolescents' participation in decision-making was negatively associated with overt contraceptive use (ARRR = 0.41; 95%CI = 0.19-0.91) and positively associated with covert contraceptive use (ARRR = 8.76; 95%CI = 2.45-31.30). Women reporting joint decision-making were more likely to report covert use vs. no use (ARRR = 3.20; 95%CI = 1.14-8.99). Women having final say in contraceptive decision-making in case of disagreements were more likely to report covert contraceptive use over no use (ARRR = 9.14; 95%CI = 3.17-26.40). Women's satisfaction with decision-making was positively associated with contraceptive use ever (AOR = 2.72; 95%CI = 1.80-4.16), and overt (ARRR = 2.68; 95%CI = 1.75-4.01) and covert contraceptive use (ARRR = 10.9; 95%CI = 2.16-54.80).
conclusionMale control over decision-making and female satisfaction with decision-making are associated with greater contraceptive use. Findings indicate that women's control over decision-making, and its relation to contraceptive use, is complex and requires more nuanced understanding for married adolescents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.